Narrative:

While in cruise flight; we received information from either fort worth or abq center that all lights were out at kama. We discussed with dispatch and accepted ZZZ as alternate if required. Center wasn't sure when lighting would be restored. We were tankering 6.8 with no alternate required so lots of fuel for holding. We decided to hold and wait for power to be restored. I called kama tower and asked for update. They said they were working on the problem. I said we would monitor their freq and please call if things changed. We entered holding. Ama tower called us and asked what type of lighting we needed to land and said that MALSR/PAPI/approach lights were operational; but runway edge lights were OTS. I reviewed fom guidance. First officer and I discussed guidance and made decision to make approach. Moon illumination was 77%; weather VMC unrestricted visibility with light winds. Configured and made approach. Tower controller didn't know it from his vantage point; but the runway remaining markers were also working and provided great runway edge determination. This coupled with aircraft lighting was very satisfactory and provided adequate lighting to permit a safe landing. Taxi and ramp environment were all adequately lit or back lit with no power outage at the terminal. Fom says at minimum partial runway lights are required. Are the approach lights; PAPI; or runway remaining marker lights included in the definition of runway lights or are runway lights limited to edge lights and centerline lights?

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: While enroute at night; crew was notified that the destination airport's runway edge lights were inoperative and the runway did not have centerline lighting. In consultation with Dispatch and AMA Tower; the crew determined that sufficient partial runway lighting was available to permit approach and landing. Specifically; the runway remaining makers were illuminated and the crew determined that those provided the 'minimum partial runway lighting' required by the airline's Operating Manual.

Narrative: While in cruise flight; we received information from either Fort Worth or ABQ Center that all lights were out at KAMA. We discussed with Dispatch and accepted ZZZ as alternate if required. Center wasn't sure when lighting would be restored. We were tankering 6.8 with no alternate required so lots of fuel for holding. We decided to hold and wait for power to be restored. I called KAMA Tower and asked for update. They said they were working on the problem. I said we would monitor their freq and please call if things changed. We entered holding. AMA tower called us and asked what type of lighting we needed to land and said that MALSR/PAPI/Approach lights were operational; but runway edge lights were OTS. I reviewed FOM guidance. FO and I discussed guidance and made decision to make approach. Moon illumination was 77%; weather VMC unrestricted visibility with light winds. Configured and made approach. Tower controller didn't know it from his vantage point; but the runway remaining markers were also working and provided great runway edge determination. This coupled with aircraft lighting was very satisfactory and provided adequate lighting to permit a safe landing. Taxi and ramp environment were all adequately lit or back lit with no power outage at the terminal. FOM says at minimum partial runway lights are required. Are the approach lights; PAPI; or runway remaining marker lights included in the definition of runway lights or are runway lights limited to edge lights and centerline lights?

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.