Narrative:

I was cleared for the VOR-23 approach at mbs, and established on the final approach course inbound. This was a practice approach under VFR/VMC with qualified safety pilot on board. Tower asked my intentions after the VOR-23, and I replied I wanted the ILS-23 to a full stop. At this point I was at MDA (1220) and 2 mi final on the VOR-23. Tower said I was 'cleared for the option', and gave me a new heading (320) and altitude (2400). I then turned to 320 and initiated a climb. Tower asked my heading, and I replied 320. Tower said I should still be on the final approach course inbound, and told me to continue 320 vectors to ILS-23. I realized immediately that even though this was a 'practice' approach under VFR, I must still complete the approach all the way to the map (in this case, mbs VOR on field).

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: DEVIATION FROM CLRNC. SMA PLT ON PRACTICE APCH MAKES MISSED APCH PRIOR TO MISSED APCH POINT.

Narrative: I WAS CLRED FOR THE VOR-23 APCH AT MBS, AND ESTABLISHED ON THE FINAL APCH COURSE INBND. THIS WAS A PRACTICE APCH UNDER VFR/VMC WITH QUALIFIED SAFETY PLT ON BOARD. TWR ASKED MY INTENTIONS AFTER THE VOR-23, AND I REPLIED I WANTED THE ILS-23 TO A FULL STOP. AT THIS POINT I WAS AT MDA (1220) AND 2 MI FINAL ON THE VOR-23. TWR SAID I WAS 'CLRED FOR THE OPTION', AND GAVE ME A NEW HDG (320) AND ALT (2400). I THEN TURNED TO 320 AND INITIATED A CLIMB. TWR ASKED MY HDG, AND I REPLIED 320. TWR SAID I SHOULD STILL BE ON THE FINAL APCH COURSE INBND, AND TOLD ME TO CONTINUE 320 VECTORS TO ILS-23. I REALIZED IMMEDIATELY THAT EVEN THOUGH THIS WAS A 'PRACTICE' APCH UNDER VFR, I MUST STILL COMPLETE THE APCH ALL THE WAY TO THE MAP (IN THIS CASE, MBS VOR ON FIELD).

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.