37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 137738 |
Time | |
Date | 199002 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : 06n |
State Reference | NY |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, Low Wing, 1 Eng, Retractable Gear |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : cfi pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 198 flight time total : 18676 |
ASRS Report | 137738 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot instruction : trainee |
Qualification | pilot : student |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : far other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other other : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
A student pilot was recommended for the private pilot certificate but did not meet the requirements of far 61.109(B)(2). His long x-country was only 276 mi. The student started flying with me after this part of the requirements were supposedly completed. This x-country was recommended to him by his first CFI, who is also a designated examiner, and I assumed it met the requirement. To prevent this from occurring again I would recommend a very careful examination of the student's logbook endorsements by previous instructors. Don't trust these entries. Check them out. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following: reporter stated that he had reviewed logbook of spi for a private pilot license and accepted the previous instructor's sign off of the cross country. Later, the spi went to another CFI, a designated examiner who questioned the length of the x-country flight and upon finding it deficient, refused to certify the spi's logbook for limited flts from one airport to another. The FAA got into this and contacted the first CFI and sent him a form 206, requesting more information regarding this event. Reporter has heard nothing further from the FAA after an apparently satisfactory explanation.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: LOGBOOK REVIEW FOR PRIVATE PLT LICENSE.
Narrative: A STUDENT PLT WAS RECOMMENDED FOR THE PRIVATE PLT CERTIFICATE BUT DID NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF FAR 61.109(B)(2). HIS LONG X-COUNTRY WAS ONLY 276 MI. THE STUDENT STARTED FLYING WITH ME AFTER THIS PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS WERE SUPPOSEDLY COMPLETED. THIS X-COUNTRY WAS RECOMMENDED TO HIM BY HIS FIRST CFI, WHO IS ALSO A DESIGNATED EXAMINER, AND I ASSUMED IT MET THE REQUIREMENT. TO PREVENT THIS FROM OCCURRING AGAIN I WOULD RECOMMEND A VERY CAREFUL EXAMINATION OF THE STUDENT'S LOGBOOK ENDORSEMENTS BY PREVIOUS INSTRUCTORS. DON'T TRUST THESE ENTRIES. CHECK THEM OUT. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH REPORTER REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: REPORTER STATED THAT HE HAD REVIEWED LOGBOOK OF SPI FOR A PRIVATE PLT LICENSE AND ACCEPTED THE PREVIOUS INSTRUCTOR'S SIGN OFF OF THE CROSS COUNTRY. LATER, THE SPI WENT TO ANOTHER CFI, A DESIGNATED EXAMINER WHO QUESTIONED THE LENGTH OF THE X-COUNTRY FLT AND UPON FINDING IT DEFICIENT, REFUSED TO CERTIFY THE SPI'S LOGBOOK FOR LIMITED FLTS FROM ONE ARPT TO ANOTHER. THE FAA GOT INTO THIS AND CONTACTED THE FIRST CFI AND SENT HIM A FORM 206, REQUESTING MORE INFO REGARDING THIS EVENT. REPORTER HAS HEARD NOTHING FURTHER FROM THE FAA AFTER AN APPARENTLY SATISFACTORY EXPLANATION.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.