Narrative:

I was the pilot monitoring on the first leg of a two leg night; going through msn. My captain had never been to msn before; and I had only been once; several weeks before the incident in question. Enroute; I felt we did an above average job of reviewing appropriate items. I remembered there had been a lot of taxiway construction when I'd been there previous; so I scoured the notams in detail several times to make sure I was aware of taxiway issues. The captain reviewed 'no tower operations' and briefed them in detail during cruise. I reviewed the company 10-10 and 10-10A pages in detail to make sure there weren't any notes about taxiway issues; etc. On the top left of the 10-9 age is a blurb about certain taxiways being restricted to aircraft with a wingspan of 117 ft or less. I was struggling a bit with my efb in the aircraft since every time I went to review the 10-9 page; it would expand and the note in question was off the viewable area of the screen since we were landing to the south. Upon landing on runway 18; we exited the runway at B5; which is one of the taxiways restricted to 117 ft wingspan or less. The captain did a very nice job of squaring up the turn and being on the centerline; but when I looked up from doing my after landing flow; I was concerned the taxiway was too narrow for us. We continued; didn't hear or feel anything unusual; and after discussing it in the chocks; I did a walk around and paid careful attention to the main gear. We felt confident there were no issues; and after turning the airplane and beginning our taxi out for the next leg; a company aircraft landed and announced he was clearing at B5. This is obviously a problem if the very next crew made the same mistake we did.although I missed the note about the taxiway restrictions; I feel it is necessary to put those notes about taxiway limitations on the company pages; or as a minimum in the notams for a period of time since they just recently returned to normal ops after extended taxiway construction. Not doing so makes it a single point of failure with non-tower operations.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: Air carrier First Officer reported landing at MSN while the Tower was closed and not noticing the note on the airport diagram restricting aircraft using Taxiway B5 to a wingspan of 117 feet or less. During taxi out; another aircraft with a wingspan greater than 117 feet was noted to land on Runway 18 and use Taxiway B5. The iPad EFB zoomed in on the airport diagram automatically cutting off the note in the upper left corner.

Narrative: I was the pilot monitoring on the first leg of a two leg night; going through MSN. My captain had never been to MSN before; and I had only been once; several weeks before the incident in question. Enroute; I felt we did an above average job of reviewing appropriate items. I remembered there had been a lot of taxiway construction when I'd been there previous; so I scoured the NOTAMs in detail several times to make sure I was aware of taxiway issues. The captain reviewed 'No tower operations' and briefed them in detail during cruise. I reviewed the company 10-10 and 10-10A pages in detail to make sure there weren't any notes about taxiway issues; etc. On the top left of the 10-9 age is a blurb about certain taxiways being restricted to aircraft with a wingspan of 117 ft or less. I was struggling a bit with my EFB in the aircraft since every time I went to review the 10-9 page; it would expand and the note in question was off the viewable area of the screen since we were landing to the south. Upon landing on runway 18; we exited the runway at B5; which is one of the taxiways restricted to 117 ft wingspan or less. The captain did a very nice job of squaring up the turn and being on the centerline; but when I looked up from doing my after landing flow; I was concerned the taxiway was too narrow for us. We continued; didn't hear or feel anything unusual; and after discussing it in the chocks; I did a walk around and paid careful attention to the main gear. We felt confident there were no issues; and after turning the airplane and beginning our taxi out for the next leg; a company aircraft landed and announced he was clearing at B5. This is obviously a problem if the very next crew made the same mistake we did.Although I missed the note about the taxiway restrictions; I feel it is necessary to put those notes about taxiway limitations on the company pages; or as a minimum in the NOTAMs for a period of time since they just recently returned to normal ops after extended taxiway construction. Not doing so makes it a single point of failure with non-tower operations.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.