37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1396861 |
Time | |
Date | 201610 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Super King Air 300 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Flap Control (Trailing & Leading Edge) |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 135 Flight Crew Total 6800 Flight Crew Type 650 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Procedural Maintenance Flight Deck / Cabin / Aircraft Event Smoke / Fire / Fumes / Odor Inflight Event / Encounter Other / Unknown |
Narrative:
At approximately 2;000 ft. The captain (pilot flying) called for 'flaps approach.' at 1;500 ft the captain called for; 'gear down; before landing checklist.' the pilot flying then called for 'flaps down.' at this point the pilot flying noticed that the control yoke became very stiff and difficult to control bank / roll. The crew noticed that the flap indicator was stuck at the 80% position and did not indicate full down. The crew elected to leave the flaps in their current setting and continue the approach as the runway was in sight. The captain controlled the aircraft with rudder (yaw) and elevator (pitch) to guide the aircraft to the runway. During the landing rollout the crew noticed a burning smell and initially suspected tire smoke as a result of the side load landing. The crew taxied the aircraft to the ramp and shut down the engines and electrical system; leaving the flaps in their current position. On the post flight inspection the noticed that the flap had separated from its track. The roller cam and the bolt that normally holds it onto its bracket were missing. The outboard section of right flap was bent where it had contacted and jammed the inboard section of the right aileron. The aileron was also damaged.the aircraft had undergone repairs which involved the removal and replacement of both flaps and had flown 5 flights since the repairs. The captain entered the discrepancy into the aircraft maintenance log and informed the company operations and safety department.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A BE-300 flight Captain reported experiencing a flap failure during approach and landing. Flight crew had difficulty controlling aircraft in the final phase of landing.
Narrative: At approximately 2;000 ft. the Captain (pilot flying) called for 'flaps approach.' At 1;500 ft the captain called for; 'gear down; before landing checklist.' The pilot flying then called for 'flaps down.' At this point the pilot flying noticed that the control yoke became very stiff and difficult to control bank / roll. The crew noticed that the flap indicator was stuck at the 80% position and did not indicate full down. The crew elected to leave the flaps in their current setting and continue the approach as the runway was in sight. The captain controlled the aircraft with rudder (yaw) and elevator (pitch) to guide the aircraft to the runway. During the landing rollout the crew noticed a burning smell and initially suspected tire smoke as a result of the side load landing. The crew taxied the aircraft to the ramp and shut down the engines and electrical system; leaving the flaps in their current position. On the post flight inspection the noticed that the flap had separated from its track. The roller cam and the bolt that normally holds it onto its bracket were missing. The outboard section of right flap was bent where it had contacted and jammed the inboard section of the right aileron. The aileron was also damaged.The aircraft had undergone repairs which involved the removal and replacement of both flaps and had flown 5 flights since the repairs. The captain entered the discrepancy into the aircraft maintenance log and informed the company operations and safety department.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.