 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Fractional captain reported the ILS frequency for runway 34 at xna; as published by jeppesen chart 21-2 (110.55); was incorrect. ATC provided the correct frequency of 111.55 and the approach was completed uneventfully.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1414880 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201701 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | XNA.Airport |
| State Reference | AR |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | IMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Light Transport Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
On arrival into xna; razorback approach gave us a heading to intercept the ILS 34; and cleared us for the approach. When we were unable to tune the localizer frequency (110.55); and notified approach. The controller told us to use 111.55; which tuned properly. Approach queried if we were able to be established on the localizer. We confirmed that we could; continued the approach and landing uneventfully.after landing; we reviewed notams for xna. One new one popped up; saying the ILS 34 amend 3 was na. We had referenced both amend 3 (current) and the previous version in jeppesen flight deck pro on our ipads. Both show 110.55 as the correct ILS frequency. There was no mention in any notams of a correction to the frequency. My first officer looked at the plate on airnav. It showed 111.55. He also looked at foreflight on his personal ipad; which also showed 111.55. It looks like our jeppesen approaches were incorrect. We later heard an [air carrier] inbound to xna having the same problem. Approach once again issued 111.55 as the correct frequency. The pilot reported that his documentation showed a different frequency.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Fractional Captain reported the ILS frequency for Runway 34 at XNA; as published by Jeppesen chart 21-2 (110.55); was incorrect. ATC provided the correct frequency of 111.55 and the approach was completed uneventfully.
Narrative: On arrival into XNA; Razorback Approach gave us a heading to intercept the ILS 34; and cleared us for the approach. When we were unable to tune the LOC frequency (110.55); and notified Approach. The controller told us to use 111.55; which tuned properly. Approach queried if we were able to be established on the localizer. We confirmed that we could; continued the approach and landing uneventfully.After landing; we reviewed NOTAMs for XNA. One new one popped up; saying the ILS 34 AMEND 3 was NA. We had referenced both AMEND 3 (current) and the previous version in Jeppesen Flight Deck Pro on our iPads. Both show 110.55 as the correct ILS frequency. There was no mention in any NOTAMs of a correction to the frequency. My FO looked at the plate on Airnav. It showed 111.55. He also looked at Foreflight on his personal iPad; which also showed 111.55. It looks like our Jeppesen approaches were incorrect. We later heard an [air carrier] inbound to XNA having the same problem. Approach once again issued 111.55 as the correct frequency. The pilot reported that his documentation showed a different frequency.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.