Narrative:

I was the captain, not flying, on flight XXX rno-sfo on apr/fri/90. Flight normal. Cleared for ILS 28R to sfo. Broke out under 2500' overcast. Traffic was called 10 O'clock 4 mi, an light transport. He was on a 040 degree heading (base leg) at 2000'. He was never cleared for the visual approach to 28L although that is what the controller intended. He made evasive action to avoid our aircraft, just as I was about to push over to descend below him. This was a very close situation! The controller was not 'fully rated'. He should insure clrncs are given and adhered to! There is no room for error on those parallel runways. He may have been pressured to start visuals before he was ready. The light transport aircraft was the first he was trying to get in visually.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: TRACON CTLR FAILED TO PROVIDE IFR STANDARD SEPARATION BETWEEN AN ACFT ON THE ILS AND AN ACFT BEING VECTORED FOR A VISUAL APCH TO A PARALLEL RWY 750' FROM OTHER RWY.

Narrative: I WAS THE CAPT, NOT FLYING, ON FLT XXX RNO-SFO ON APR/FRI/90. FLT NORMAL. CLRED FOR ILS 28R TO SFO. BROKE OUT UNDER 2500' OVERCAST. TFC WAS CALLED 10 O'CLOCK 4 MI, AN LTT. HE WAS ON A 040 DEG HDG (BASE LEG) AT 2000'. HE WAS NEVER CLRED FOR THE VISUAL APCH TO 28L ALTHOUGH THAT IS WHAT THE CTLR INTENDED. HE MADE EVASIVE ACTION TO AVOID OUR ACFT, JUST AS I WAS ABOUT TO PUSH OVER TO DSND BELOW HIM. THIS WAS A VERY CLOSE SITUATION! THE CTLR WAS NOT 'FULLY RATED'. HE SHOULD INSURE CLRNCS ARE GIVEN AND ADHERED TO! THERE IS NO ROOM FOR ERROR ON THOSE PARALLEL RWYS. HE MAY HAVE BEEN PRESSURED TO START VISUALS BEFORE HE WAS READY. THE LTT ACFT WAS THE FIRST HE WAS TRYING TO GET IN VISUALLY.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.