37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1442595 |
Time | |
Date | 201704 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Environment | |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737-900 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Parked |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Horizontal Stabilizer |
Person 1 | |
Function | Technician |
Qualification | Maintenance Airframe Maintenance Powerplant |
Person 2 | |
Function | Technician |
Qualification | Maintenance Airframe Maintenance Powerplant |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
I stopped to see if the technician working the aircraft on the gate needed help. I had overheard a radio call about a dent on the left horizontal stabilizer. I also heard the supervisor say the damage was old and had been archived. When I arrived at the gate; several technicians were looking at the damage. The general consensus was it was new damage and needed to be addressed. The base maintenance was notified on the radio that we needed 30 minutes to evaluate the damage. At that time the supervisor made a radio call to the base maintenance and said the damage had been archived; the aircraft was released and ready to go. The technician working the gate wanted to create a logbook entry and called the shift manager to inform him. The shift manager informed him that based on the information he had received from his supervisor; the damage had been addressed and was good to go. The supervisor was also reported as telling another technician that felt the damage was out of limits that he didn't know what he was talking about.I believe the technician working the gate was placed under unreasonable pressure by management not to make a logbook entry. Prior the aircraft departing I took several photographs of the damage and showed them to the shift manager and the supervisor. The shift manager informed me that he had contacted maintenance control at the arrival airport to investigate the damage when the aircraft arrived. He requested that I send him the photos that I had taken so he could send them to maintenance control. The supervisor told me that after seeing the photos that he had called the control center and attempted to stop the aircraft from departing but was too late. This all took place within minutes of departure time and the aircraft was allowed to depart to ZZZ1.as of the next morning; I checked for a log or entry in maintenance software regarding the damage but found none. I found the aircraft had been dispatched to ZZZ2 and was about to depart for [an international flight]. At which time I attempted to contact the shift manager on duty without success. I then contacted the hangar supervisor who contacted maintenance control and the shift manager. The aircraft was taken out of service in ZZZ2.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Maintenance Technicians reported that a B737 was allowed to continue in service before it could be determined if a dent was within limits.
Narrative: I stopped to see if the technician working the aircraft on the gate needed help. I had overheard a radio call about a dent on the left horizontal stabilizer. I also heard the Supervisor say the damage was old and had been archived. When I arrived at the gate; several technicians were looking at the damage. The general consensus was it was new damage and needed to be addressed. The Base Maintenance was notified on the radio that we needed 30 minutes to evaluate the damage. At that time the Supervisor made a radio call to the Base Maintenance and said the damage had been archived; the aircraft was released and ready to go. The technician working the gate wanted to create a logbook entry and called the shift manager to inform him. The shift manager informed him that based on the information he had received from his Supervisor; the damage had been addressed and was good to go. The Supervisor was also reported as telling another technician that felt the damage was out of limits that he didn't know what he was talking about.I believe the technician working the gate was placed under unreasonable pressure by management not to make a logbook entry. Prior the aircraft departing I took several photographs of the damage and showed them to the shift manager and the Supervisor. The shift manager informed me that he had contacted Maintenance Control at the arrival airport to investigate the damage when the aircraft arrived. He requested that I send him the photos that I had taken so he could send them to Maintenance Control. The Supervisor told me that after seeing the photos that he had called the control center and attempted to stop the aircraft from departing but was too late. This all took place within minutes of departure time and the aircraft was allowed to depart to ZZZ1.As of the next morning; I checked for a log or entry in maintenance software regarding the damage but found none. I found the aircraft had been dispatched to ZZZ2 and was about to depart for [an international flight]. At which time I attempted to contact the shift manager on duty without success. I then contacted the hangar Supervisor who contacted Maintenance Control and the shift manager. The aircraft was taken out of service in ZZZ2.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.