37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1450261 |
Time | |
Date | 201705 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | SCK.Airport |
State Reference | CA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Single Engine Turboprop Undifferentiated |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Route In Use | Other Missed Approach |
Flight Plan | None |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft Low Wing 1 Eng Fixed Gear |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 50 Flight Crew Total 2100 Flight Crew Type 960 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict NMAC Deviation - Altitude Excursion From Assigned Altitude Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Speed All Types |
Miss Distance | Horizontal 5 Vertical 300 |
Narrative:
I was under instruction for an annual re-currency. We were conducting a missed approach off of GPS 29R under visual conditions. My instructor simulated a rollback. Norcal asked us to turn to 260 which we acknowledged. Our speed had slowed; and possibly we lost some altitude while I was bringing the power back up using the emergency control toggle for the fuel control unit. As we were rolling to 260; an aircraft passed directly under us very closely. The aircraft was going faster than us at the time.I am not certain if the aircraft had us visually; perhaps this is what the norcal controller was relying on. I believe we were not provided with adequate separation. I believe that we (the aircraft and my airplane) should have been given instruction to provide a larger degree of separation. One contributing factor could have been that we had slowed our airspeed during the simulated engine rollback maneuver. This was not communicated to ATC.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A single engine turboprop pilot reported a near-mid-air-collision while conducting a practice engine power loss during a missed approach.
Narrative: I was under instruction for an annual re-currency. We were conducting a missed approach off of GPS 29R under visual conditions. My instructor simulated a rollback. NorCal asked us to turn to 260 which we acknowledged. Our speed had slowed; and possibly we lost some altitude while I was bringing the power back up using the emergency control toggle for the fuel control unit. As we were rolling to 260; an aircraft passed directly under us very closely. The aircraft was going faster than us at the time.I am not certain if the aircraft had us visually; perhaps this is what the NorCal controller was relying on. I believe we were not provided with adequate separation. I believe that we (the aircraft and my airplane) should have been given instruction to provide a larger degree of separation. One contributing factor could have been that we had slowed our airspeed during the simulated engine rollback maneuver. This was not communicated to ATC.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.