Frg local controller reported an airborne conflict occurred when an aircraft that was on a convergin...

Attributes
ACN	1451574
Time
Date	201705
Local Time Of Day	1201-1800
Place
Locale Reference	FRG.Airport
State Reference	NY
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Aircraft 1
Make Model Name	Medium Transport
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	Final Approach
Route In Use	Visual Approach
Flight Plan	IFR
Aircraft 2
Make Model Name	Small Aircraft Low Wing 1 Eng Fixed Gear
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	Final Approach
Person 1
Function	Local
Qualification	Air Traffic Control Fully Certified
Experience	Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 1.0
Events
Anomaly	ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Track / Heading All Types

Narrative:

Aircraft Y was inbound to a reporting point 3 miles east of the field for the midfield right downwind from the southeast at 4;000 feet. Aircraft X was joining the midfield right downwind at 2;000 feet. Aircraft Y was issued a control instruction to maintain at or above 2;500 feet. Aircraft Y refused to answer repeated instructions to stop his descent. Another aircraft was broken off final so I could turn aircraft X to final to avoid an opposite direction midair when aircraft Y would not answer. Traffic and safety alerts were issued. Aircraft X turned in with less than a mile and 0 vertical feet from aircraft Y. Aircraft Y finally answered and reported over a reporting point 4 miles from his actual position oblivious to anything going on. I cleared aircraft Y to land and instructed him to call the tower. The supervisor who I reported this all; who witnessed it all unfold as the operational supervisor did not file an mor (mandatory occurrence report) and when he talked to the pilot he told the pilot to be more careful next time.pilots who disregard control instructions should be reported to flight standards and paperwork needs to be filed. A supervisor should not just brush this under the rug.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FRG Local Controller reported an airborne conflict occurred when an aircraft that was on a converging course with other traffic in their pattern did not respond to their instructions.

Narrative: Aircraft Y was inbound to a reporting point 3 miles east of the field for the midfield right downwind from the southeast at 4;000 feet. Aircraft X was joining the midfield right downwind at 2;000 feet. Aircraft Y was issued a control instruction to maintain at or above 2;500 feet. Aircraft Y refused to answer repeated instructions to stop his descent. Another aircraft was broken off final so I could turn aircraft X to final to avoid an opposite direction midair when aircraft Y would not answer. Traffic and safety alerts were issued. Aircraft X turned in with less than a mile and 0 vertical feet from aircraft Y. Aircraft Y finally answered and reported over a reporting point 4 miles from his actual position oblivious to anything going on. I cleared aircraft Y to land and instructed him to call the tower. The supervisor who I reported this all; who witnessed it all unfold as the operational Supervisor did not file an MOR (Mandatory Occurrence Report) and when he talked to the pilot he told the pilot to be more careful next time.Pilots who disregard control instructions should be reported to flight standards and paperwork needs to be filed. A Supervisor should not just brush this under the rug.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

Frg local controller reported an airborne conflict occurred when an aircraft that was on a converging course with other traffic in their pattern did not respond to their instructions.