Narrative:

On takeoff roll. Captain called out 'rotate'. I began to rotate and noticed airplane didn't feel ready to fly; so I slowed the rotation rate until I felt the main gear liftoff. I then resumed to rotate to target pitch attitude. At that point I noticed the airspeed was right around V2. Climbed out of terminal area and then reviewed takeoff data. We determined the captain's airspeed bugs were set lower than the performance data called for. I concluded that was why the rotation felt mushy. Upon arrival; a walk around revealed a scrape on the tailskid. No other damage found by mechanic. Believe the event was caused by pilot monitoring (pm) setting wrong vr speed bug; pilot flying failed to catch that error and had already transitioned visual scan to outside the aircraft and failed to verify speed when pm made rotate call. Flaps 5 takeoff; reduced thrust made tail clearance minimal to begin with and margin for error was small. I feel proper adherence to standard rotation rate helped identify an irregular condition and subsequent action of slowing rotation rate prevented any damage from occurring.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B767 flight crew reported that the tail skid contacted the runway on takeoff because a Vr speed lower than the performance data specified was entered in the FMC.

Narrative: On takeoff roll. Captain called out 'rotate'. I began to rotate and noticed airplane didn't feel ready to fly; so I slowed the rotation rate until I felt the main gear liftoff. I then resumed to rotate to target pitch attitude. At that point I noticed the airspeed was right around V2. Climbed out of terminal area and then reviewed takeoff data. We determined the Captain's airspeed bugs were set lower than the performance data called for. I concluded that was why the rotation felt mushy. Upon arrival; a walk around revealed a scrape on the tailskid. No other damage found by mechanic. Believe the event was caused by Pilot Monitoring (PM) setting wrong Vr speed bug; Pilot Flying failed to catch that error and had already transitioned visual scan to outside the aircraft and failed to verify speed when PM made rotate call. Flaps 5 takeoff; reduced thrust made tail clearance minimal to begin with and margin for error was small. I feel proper adherence to standard rotation rate helped identify an irregular condition and subsequent action of slowing rotation rate prevented any damage from occurring.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.