37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1473534 |
Time | |
Date | 201708 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | AVQ.Airport |
State Reference | AZ |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Small Transport Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Route In Use | Direct Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Single Pilot Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 90 Flight Crew Total 3200 Flight Crew Type 220 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Airspace Violation All Types Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
I was repositioning the aircraft to avq. Approximately 30 miles from marana I started monitoring CTAF in my #2 radio. There was a cirrus on a similar route as me that I was overtaking. I told center that unless tucson approach had taken my handoff I would cancel IFR so that I could coordinate spacing to marana with the VFR cirrus. Center advised me that there was no other traffic observed between me and the marana airport and frequency change was approved. I slowed down and configured early to keep spacing on final. The aircraft ahead reported over pinal airpark shortly before I did; I then also reported over pinal. A voice then came onto CTAF and advised me I had flown through an active military drop zone at pinal. I apologized and landed normally. I have several concerns about the jump operation at pinal. 1. I had briefed through duats before departure and saw no NOTAM for parachute activity at pinal. 2. Center did not advise me of any jump activity over pinal. Center and approach typically will advise when the jump area over pinal and other surrounding airports is hot. Absent this; I joined an extended final approach to 12 to allow time to slow and configure for spacing. 3. The aircraft ahead also reported over pinal. If the jump zone went hot in the less than 3 minutes between CTAF reports with no advisory over marana CTAF as well as center and approach not being aware; a serious conflict could develop. 4. Having a drop zone located on a 10 mile final to the calm wind runway at a busy non-towered airport with large amounts of jet traffic does not seem like a good idea to me.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Corporate jet pilot reported unknowingly flying through a military drop zone at MZJ during final approach to AVQ.
Narrative: I was repositioning the aircraft to AVQ. Approximately 30 miles from Marana I started monitoring CTAF in my #2 radio. There was a Cirrus on a similar route as me that I was overtaking. I told Center that unless Tucson Approach had taken my handoff I would cancel IFR so that I could coordinate spacing to Marana with the VFR Cirrus. Center advised me that there was no other traffic observed between me and the Marana airport and frequency change was approved. I slowed down and configured early to keep spacing on final. The aircraft ahead reported over Pinal airpark shortly before I did; I then also reported over Pinal. A voice then came onto CTAF and advised me I had flown through an active military drop zone at Pinal. I apologized and landed normally. I have several concerns about the jump operation at Pinal. 1. I had briefed through DUATS before departure and saw no NOTAM for parachute activity at Pinal. 2. Center did not advise me of any jump activity over Pinal. Center and Approach typically will advise when the jump area over Pinal and other surrounding airports is hot. Absent this; I joined an extended final approach to 12 to allow time to slow and configure for spacing. 3. The aircraft ahead also reported over Pinal. If the jump zone went hot in the less than 3 minutes between CTAF reports with no advisory over Marana CTAF as well as Center and Approach not being aware; a serious conflict could develop. 4. Having a drop zone located on a 10 mile final to the calm wind runway at a busy non-towered airport with large amounts of jet traffic does not seem like a good idea to me.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.