37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1489259 |
Time | |
Date | 201710 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZMP.ARTCC |
State Reference | MN |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737-900 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Route In Use | Direct |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | B737-800 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Route In Use | Direct |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Enroute |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Experience | Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 26 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Aircraft X was eastbound at 37;000 ft coming from denver center. Aircraft Y was northeast bound at 37;000 ft also coming from the same sector on a converging course with aircraft X. The radar controller took the handoffs on both aircraft X and aircraft Y approximately 30 miles inside the adjacent center boundary and they transferred communications on both aircraft even though they were going to lose separation inside their airspace. The radar controller immediately turned aircraft Y 15 degrees left to go behind aircraft X. Because the winds were from the northwest at 70 knots aircraft Y lost some airspeed in his turn. If not for the wind direction and the turn by the controller; separation would have been lost. Aircraft Y passed about 6.5 miles behind aircraft X. I added aircraft Z to the list of aircraft involved because aircraft Z was just north of both aircraft; eastbound and at 37;000 ft. The radar controller had to time the turn back on course with aircraft Y otherwise separation would have been lost between aircraft Y and aircraft Z.send a team of investigators to ZDV to find out why they are not required to separate aircraft!
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ZMP Center Controller reported an adjacent Center controller handed off two aircraft that were converging inside their airspace.
Narrative: Aircraft X was eastbound at 37;000 ft coming from Denver Center. Aircraft Y was northeast bound at 37;000 ft also coming from the same sector on a converging course with Aircraft X. The Radar controller took the handoffs on both Aircraft X and Aircraft Y approximately 30 miles inside the adjacent Center boundary and they transferred communications on both aircraft even though they were going to lose separation inside their airspace. The Radar controller immediately turned Aircraft Y 15 degrees left to go behind Aircraft X. Because the winds were from the northwest at 70 knots Aircraft Y lost some airspeed in his turn. If not for the wind direction and the turn by the controller; separation would have been lost. Aircraft Y passed about 6.5 miles behind Aircraft X. I added Aircraft Z to the list of aircraft involved because Aircraft Z was just north of both aircraft; eastbound and at 37;000 ft. The Radar controller had to time the turn back on course with Aircraft Y otherwise separation would have been lost between Aircraft Y and Aircraft Z.Send a team of investigators to ZDV to find out why they are not required to separate aircraft!
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.