 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Md-83 captain reported a violent vibration and shudder throughout the airframe after deploying thrust reversers on landing.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1512279 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201801 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Environment | |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | MD-83 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Landing |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe |
Narrative:
I was pilot monitoring; first officer (first officer) was the pilot flying. Approach and landing was smooth and stable. Touchdown on main gear was soft and smooth; the PF (pilot flying); gently lowered nose wheel to ground; deployed thrust reverser. At approximately 90 knots and decelerating we felt a violent shudder and vibration throughout the airframe. There were no indications of a compressor stall. I suspected a blown tire. I took control of the aircraft and brought it to a full stop on runway xx. We asked tower to visually inspect our landing gear for signs of a blown tire. Tower reported no signs of a blown tire or other problems. We taxied clear of the runway; stopped and requested arff (airport rescue and fire fighting) to take a closer inspection of the aircraft and landing gear. Arff inspected the aircraft and reported no signs of any damage to the aircraft. We contacted maintenance; and with their concurrence continued to taxi to the gate with arff escort. On arrival at the gate; I made an entry into the aml describing the vibration. The first officer did a post flight walk around and did not find any damage or discrepancy to the aircraft. We briefed a mechanic on the nature of the problem prior to leaving for our next flight.we suspect a possible problem with an anti-skid system or brakes. Initial thought was a blown tire; but visual inspection ruled out blown tire.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: MD-83 Captain reported a violent vibration and shudder throughout the airframe after deploying thrust reversers on landing.
Narrative: I was pilot monitoring; FO (First Officer) was the pilot flying. Approach and landing was smooth and stable. Touchdown on main gear was soft and smooth; The PF (Pilot Flying); gently lowered nose wheel to ground; deployed thrust reverser. At approximately 90 knots and decelerating we felt a violent shudder and vibration throughout the airframe. There were no indications of a compressor stall. I suspected a blown tire. I took control of the aircraft and brought it to a full stop on runway XX. We asked tower to visually inspect our landing gear for signs of a blown tire. Tower reported no signs of a blown tire or other problems. We taxied clear of the runway; stopped and requested ARFF (Airport Rescue and Fire Fighting) to take a closer inspection of the aircraft and landing gear. ARFF inspected the aircraft and reported no signs of any damage to the aircraft. We contacted Maintenance; and with their concurrence continued to taxi to the gate with ARFF escort. On arrival at the gate; I made an entry into the AML describing the vibration. The FO did a post flight walk around and did not find any damage or discrepancy to the aircraft. We briefed a mechanic on the nature of the problem prior to leaving for our next flight.We suspect a possible problem with an anti-skid system or brakes. Initial thought was a blown tire; but visual inspection ruled out blown tire.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.