37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 151525 |
Time | |
Date | 199007 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : alo |
State Reference | IA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 2500 msl bound upper : 2550 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : alo |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Retractable Gear |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Qualification | controller : radar |
ASRS Report | 151525 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Qualification | controller : developmental |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : far other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 1000 vertical : 50 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
I was working arrival/departure radar with a developmental. We had 8-10 aircraft on the frequency. The developmental issued traffic to both of the aircraft involved. Small aircraft X was circling over the city at various altitudes but was indicating a 2900' MSL when traffic was issued to him as an small aircraft Y sebnd from waterloo at 2500' MSL. Traffic was also issued to small aircraft Y as sebnd flying locally over the city at various altitudes and the pilot reported the other aircraft in sight. 3 or 4 mins later, small aircraft X said an aircraft came very close to him as he had apparently descended from 2900' MSL to about 2550' MSL. Recommendations: we, ATC, should have instructed small aircraft X to stay at 3000' MSL until he had small aircraft Y in sight. Also, small aircraft Y pilot should not have descended his aircraft into the altitude of small aircraft X especially after acknowledging ATC as to the small aircraft Y at 2500' MSL and heading for the area that he was flying in.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: SMA CAME INTO CLOSE PROX TO ANOTHER SMA AFTER TRAFFIC WAS ISSUED.
Narrative: I WAS WORKING ARR/DEP RADAR WITH A DEVELOPMENTAL. WE HAD 8-10 ACFT ON THE FREQ. THE DEVELOPMENTAL ISSUED TFC TO BOTH OF THE ACFT INVOLVED. SMA X WAS CIRCLING OVER THE CITY AT VARIOUS ALTS BUT WAS INDICATING A 2900' MSL WHEN TFC WAS ISSUED TO HIM AS AN SMA Y SEBND FROM WATERLOO AT 2500' MSL. TFC WAS ALSO ISSUED TO SMA Y AS SEBND FLYING LOCALLY OVER THE CITY AT VARIOUS ALTS AND THE PLT RPTED THE OTHER ACFT IN SIGHT. 3 OR 4 MINS LATER, SMA X SAID AN ACFT CAME VERY CLOSE TO HIM AS HE HAD APPARENTLY DSNDED FROM 2900' MSL TO ABOUT 2550' MSL. RECOMMENDATIONS: WE, ATC, SHOULD HAVE INSTRUCTED SMA X TO STAY AT 3000' MSL UNTIL HE HAD SMA Y IN SIGHT. ALSO, SMA Y PLT SHOULD NOT HAVE DSNDED HIS ACFT INTO THE ALT OF SMA X ESPECIALLY AFTER ACKNOWLEDGING ATC AS TO THE SMA Y AT 2500' MSL AND HDG FOR THE AREA THAT HE WAS FLYING IN.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.