37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1521557 |
Time | |
Date | 201802 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.TRACON |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 200 ER/LR (CRJ200) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Autopilot |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Inflight Event / Encounter Unstabilized Approach |
Narrative:
On approach we had been given a left turn to intercept the localizer and we were cleared for the approach. We got an auto pilot trim warning message that had gone away on its own. No pilot action. Approach mode was armed and the auto pilot seemed to join and track the localizer until it did two separate snap rolls of 10 degrees or more to the right which was opposite of the correction needed for the localizer. At that time I disconnected the autopilot and rejoined the localizer. After we rejoined the localizer the airplane kept wanting to roll left even after adding more than half of the available rearward aileron trim. We were now established on the ILS with the airplane still wanting to roll to the left; due to the hard tendency to roll left we had become left of course and unstable. We had reached visual conditions and elected to continue due to it being a possible flight control issue that seemed to be getting worse as we flew. We landed and rolled out without incident. We called and notified maintenance of the discrepancy.autopilot making incorrect and erratic corrections to track the localizer. Night IMC conditions with a trim system that seemed to be fighting our inputs.remember to keep a quick and efficient instrument scan going even when the scan requires you to check other things that you normally wouldn't. Possibly add into preflight or approach briefings what actions you would take if you have a flight control or trim issue just like we brief if we have an engine failure.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CRJ-200 First Officer reported that on approach mode the autopilot kept wanting to roll left.
Narrative: On approach we had been given a left turn to intercept the LOC and we were cleared for the approach. We got an auto pilot trim warning message that had gone away on its own. No pilot action. Approach mode was armed and the auto pilot seemed to join and track the LOC until it did two separate snap rolls of 10 degrees or more to the right which was opposite of the correction needed for the LOC. At that time I disconnected the autopilot and rejoined the LOC. After we rejoined the LOC the airplane kept wanting to roll left even after adding more than half of the available Rearward aileron trim. We were now established on the ILS with the airplane still wanting to roll to the left; due to the hard tendency to roll left we had become left of course and unstable. We had reached visual conditions and elected to continue due to it being a possible flight control issue that seemed to be getting worse as we flew. We landed and rolled out without incident. We called and notified Maintenance of the discrepancy.Autopilot making incorrect and erratic corrections to track the LOC. Night IMC conditions with a trim system that seemed to be fighting our inputs.Remember to keep a quick and efficient instrument scan going even when the scan requires you to check other things that you normally wouldn't. Possibly add into preflight or approach briefings what actions you would take if you have a flight control or trim issue just like we brief if we have an engine failure.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.