37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 152492 |
Time | |
Date | 199007 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 0001 To 0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : dtw |
State Reference | MI |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 3000 msl bound upper : 3000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : dtw tower : dtw artcc : zau |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Small Transport, Low Wing, 2 Recip Eng |
Flight Phase | descent other |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Experience | controller radar : 8 flight time last 90 days : 0 flight time total : 500 flight time type : 0 |
ASRS Report | 152492 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : local |
Qualification | controller : non radar |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : runway non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Error |
Narrative:
After receiving approval from the local controller, I cleared an aircraft for a visibility approach to runway 3L at dtw, not remembering that runway 3L was closed. During construction activities at dtw, various runways are closed and reopened at various times. I believe that inadequate posting of this information was a contributing factor. Another contributing factor was I was giving an aircraft a runway for informal noise abatement while attempting to expedite traffic, rather than utilizing the active runway. The biggest reason that I believe the pilot didn't prevent the error was the ATIS stated, 'runway 21R closed,' rather than stating runway 21R, 3L closed. This was similar to an item published recently in your 'callback' publication.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACFT WAS CLEARED FOR VISUAL APCH TO A CLOSED RWY. CTLR FORGOT ABOUT THE RWY STATUS.
Narrative: AFTER RECEIVING APPROVAL FROM THE LCL CTLR, I CLRED AN ACFT FOR A VIS APCH TO RWY 3L AT DTW, NOT REMEMBERING THAT RWY 3L WAS CLOSED. DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AT DTW, VARIOUS RWYS ARE CLOSED AND REOPENED AT VARIOUS TIMES. I BELIEVE THAT INADEQUATE POSTING OF THIS INFO WAS A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR. ANOTHER CONTRIBUTING FACTOR WAS I WAS GIVING AN ACFT A RWY FOR INFORMAL NOISE ABATEMENT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO EXPEDITE TFC, RATHER THAN UTILIZING THE ACTIVE RWY. THE BIGGEST REASON THAT I BELIEVE THE PLT DIDN'T PREVENT THE ERROR WAS THE ATIS STATED, 'RWY 21R CLOSED,' RATHER THAN STATING RWY 21R, 3L CLOSED. THIS WAS SIMILAR TO AN ITEM PUBLISHED RECENTLY IN YOUR 'CALLBACK' PUBLICATION.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.