37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1541998 |
Time | |
Date | 201805 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ATL.Airport |
State Reference | GA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet CL65 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Takeoff |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying First Officer |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Inflight Event / Encounter Wake Vortex Encounter |
Narrative:
Just after liftoff at approximately 400 feet; we received a wind shear warning. We were climbing out closely behind another aircraft. The weather had no indication of wind shear whatsoever. No ATIS indication; no aircraft in front or behind us indicating a change in airspeed; no gusty winds. Absolutely nothing. I had rotated slowly as we were following the jet ahead and as I rolled the aircraft off the runway; I probably slightly under-rotated. Given my airspeed and V2; I increased pitch. It was as the airspeed returned to approximately V2+10 we received the warning. I actually saw no indication external to the aircraft of a stagnation. I put the pitch of the aircraft in the flight director bars and monitored both thrust; airspeed and climb. I had called for speed mode/heading mode and actually didn't realize immediately the pitch mode to GA and roll mode. I looked up and thought the first officer had chosen the wrong thing. I asked for navigation and speed. We were tracking the departure; which we continued normally. Departure told us to delete the speed on the departure but before that would have been effective they gave us; (and the aircraft ahead of us; and the aircraft behind us for that matter) a direct turn to 180 degrees instead of the normal departure. We continued the climb out and enroute.I do not think this was actually a wind shear event. There was no stagnation evident; there was no weather to indicate it either before or after; and there was no demonstrable performance decrease. What I think this was a result of the trend toward V2+10 and maybe some wake from the aircraft ahead (which we didn't even feel).
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A Regional Jet flight crew reported receiving a windshear warning on takeoff from ATL that may have been related to the preceding aircraft's wake.
Narrative: Just after liftoff at approximately 400 feet; we received a Wind Shear Warning. We were climbing out closely behind another aircraft. The weather had no indication of wind shear whatsoever. NO ATIS indication; NO aircraft in front or behind us indicating a change in airspeed; NO gusty winds. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. I had rotated slowly as we were following the jet ahead and as I rolled the aircraft off the runway; I probably slightly under-rotated. Given my airspeed and V2; I increased pitch. It was as the airspeed returned to approximately V2+10 we received the warning. I actually saw NO indication external to the aircraft of a stagnation. I put the pitch of the aircraft in the flight director bars and monitored both thrust; airspeed and climb. I had called for speed mode/heading mode and actually didn't realize immediately the pitch mode to GA and ROLL mode. I looked up and thought the First Officer had chosen the wrong thing. I asked for NAV and Speed. We were tracking the departure; which we continued normally. Departure told us to delete the speed on the departure but before that would have been effective they gave us; (and the aircraft ahead of us; and the aircraft behind us for that matter) a direct turn to 180 degrees instead of the normal departure. We continued the climb out and enroute.I do not think this was actually a wind shear event. There was no stagnation evident; there was no weather to indicate it either before or after; and there was no demonstrable performance decrease. What I think this was a result of the trend toward V2+10 and maybe some wake from the aircraft ahead (which we didn't even feel).
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.