37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1543276 |
Time | |
Date | 201805 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.TRACON |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 145 ER/LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Flap Control (Trailing & Leading Edge) |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying First Officer |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Weight And Balance |
Narrative:
Took off from ZZZ with flaps 18 and once reaching fra (flap retraction altitude); on schedule; the captain requested flaps 9 and I selected them and we received 'flap fail' message. We ran the QRH and contacted dispatch. We went over our options and held at [waypoint] for about 45 minute and burned fuel to be underweight for landing. The aircraft was approximately 400 lbs over the landing weight and we decided to land due to the storm coming to the field. With the speeds being higher than usual we didn't want a slick runway or possible wind shear to make the landing more complex than it already was. The landing was very smooth and vs did not exceed 300 FPM. We did talk about going to another airport but we were restricted to 200 knots and weather was absolutely everywhere. Dispatch suggested ZZZ1 which would been 1.30 hr to get there. We discussed passenger handling and accommodations and ultimately agreed that the landing back at ZZZ was the best action.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: EMB-145 First Officer reported mechanical issues with the flap system during takeoff climb.
Narrative: Took off from ZZZ with flaps 18 and once reaching FRA (Flap Retraction Altitude); on schedule; the Captain requested flaps 9 and I selected them and we received 'FLAP FAIL' message. We ran the QRH and contacted Dispatch. We went over our options and held at [waypoint] for about 45 minute and burned fuel to be underweight for landing. The aircraft was approximately 400 lbs over the landing weight and we decided to land due to the storm coming to the field. With the speeds being higher than usual we didn't want a slick runway or possible wind shear to make the landing more complex than it already was. The landing was very smooth and VS did not exceed 300 FPM. We did talk about going to another airport but we were restricted to 200 knots and weather was absolutely everywhere. Dispatch suggested ZZZ1 which would been 1.30 hr to get there. We discussed passenger handling and accommodations and ultimately agreed that the landing back at ZZZ was the best action.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.