37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1543910 |
Time | |
Date | 201805 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | EDUU.ARTCC |
State Reference | FO |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B767 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Air/Ground Communication |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
This event occurred while we were in german airspace (5009n/00850e) at FL390 and using cpdlc (controller pilot datalink communication). We had been given frequency changes via cpdlc several times prior and responded to ATC. The frequency we were on became quiet. We requested a radio check. There was no response. Moments later; I transmitted on guard and received a few different frequencies from the other aircraft in the area and ATC. We were cpdlc and thus a limited number of verbal transmissions occurred. Our focus was primarily on recognizing frequency changes via cpdlc. I was able to hear communications on assigned frequency. When transmissions were no longer frequent; I promptly queried and discovered the loss of contact. In the future while in cpdlc airspace; I will request radio checks with ATC on a regular basis. Just as when using voice communication; cpdlc has the propensity of forgotten frequency changes by controllers.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B767 Captain reported experiencing communication difficulties while using CPDLC as the primary means of communication.
Narrative: This event occurred while we were in German airspace (5009n/00850e) at FL390 and using CPDLC (Controller Pilot DataLink Communication). We had been given frequency changes via CPDLC several times prior and responded to ATC. The frequency we were on became quiet. We requested a radio check. There was no response. Moments later; I transmitted on guard and received a few different frequencies from the other aircraft in the area and ATC. We were CPDLC and thus a limited number of verbal transmissions occurred. Our focus was primarily on recognizing frequency changes via CPDLC. I was able to hear communications on assigned frequency. When transmissions were no longer frequent; I promptly queried and discovered the loss of contact. In the future while in CPDLC airspace; I will request radio checks with ATC on a regular basis. Just as when using voice communication; CPDLC has the propensity of forgotten frequency changes by controllers.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.