37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1550479 |
Time | |
Date | 201806 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | HCF.TRACON |
State Reference | HI |
Environment | |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | A321 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Approach |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT |
Narrative:
I noticed aircraft X was establishing himself on the localizer at 2;000. The minimum safe altitude for the localizer is 3;000. I told aircraft X that minimum safe altitude was 3;000 and climbed him back to 3;000. Aircraft X stated I told him 2;000. I don't believe I cleared him at 2;000; but I didn't want to argue with him on frequency; so I just climbed him back up. I still believe I had him join at 3;000; but I haven't heard the tapes so I can't be sure. If he did read back 2;000 instead of 3;000; I was probably just fatigued.if this is a hearback/readback issue; I blame the short staffing at the hcf. I am fatigued; as are my coworkers. I am on the no list for overtime; but I was forced to stay an extra two hours and work a ten hour day; the date of this incident. I honestly believe if the facility were staffed properly; the controllers would be better rested and better able to control traffic. On the night in question; management staffed a d-side only as a controller; but she was limited to where and what times she can work; so this caused long periods on position for all of the controllers. Fatigue is playing a factor in our day-to-day operations. I hope that management will staff overtime (an 8 hour person versus just holding over a person already working 8 hours; to make it a 10 hour day) during rimpac because I fear a catastrophic incident could potentially happen.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: HCF Controller reported a possible missed altitude readback from an A321 flight crew resulted in descent below the MVA. Staffing and fatigue were cited as contributing factors.
Narrative: I noticed Aircraft X was establishing himself on the localizer at 2;000. The minimum safe altitude for the localizer is 3;000. I told Aircraft X that minimum safe altitude was 3;000 and climbed him back to 3;000. Aircraft X stated I told him 2;000. I don't believe I cleared him at 2;000; but I didn't want to argue with him on frequency; so I just climbed him back up. I still believe I had him join at 3;000; but I haven't heard the tapes so I can't be sure. If he did read back 2;000 instead of 3;000; I was probably just fatigued.If this is a hearback/readback issue; I blame the short staffing at the HCF. I am fatigued; as are my coworkers. I am on the no list for overtime; but I was forced to stay an extra two hours and work a ten hour day; the date of this incident. I honestly believe if the facility were staffed properly; the controllers would be better rested and better able to control traffic. On the night in question; management staffed a D-Side only as a controller; but she was limited to where and what times she can work; so this caused long periods on position for all of the controllers. Fatigue is playing a factor in our day-to-day operations. I hope that management will staff overtime (an 8 hour person versus just holding over a person already working 8 hours; to make it a 10 hour day) during RIMPAC because I fear a catastrophic incident could potentially happen.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.