37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1571094 |
Time | |
Date | 201808 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Cessna 310/T310C |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Function | Local Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Private Flight Crew Instrument |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 15 Flight Crew Total 7800 Flight Crew Type 4800 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict NMAC Deviation - Speed All Types |
Miss Distance | Vertical 300 |
Narrative:
This was a frightening misjudgment by controller.[I] arrived at ZZZ [in a] C310. My recollection of communications with tower may be incorrect.[runway] xx was the active. One (or maybe two) aircraft were ahead of me and requested [runway] xy. As I am based at [an FBO]; I too requested [runway] xy. I entered downwind and was cleared to land. On final; I observed an airliner taking off from [runway] xx. Initially [I] thought to go around; but [I] was well above the jet as it took off. It was evident I could safely land on [runway] xy. Then; tower ordered me to go around; which I did.I was cleared to land and did so without any problem. I asked tower why the conflict and was told I was too fast. In any case; regardless of airspeed; the controller must have been fully informed. [The controller] told me I was doing 150 [knots]. I doubt that as I do short final at 100 [knots]. While I name [the controller]; I mean no criticism. She was very professional and helpful.bottom line; fast or not; I find it incomprehensible the controller could clear me to land [runway] xy and the airliner to takeoff [runway] xx. As the airliner was on the ground; there could not have been urgency. Takeoff clearance could have been delayed 3 minutes with no significant effect.my suspicion is that the tower controller was new and inexperienced.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Cessna 310 pilot reported a NMAC after ATC cleared the pilot to land and then directed a missed approach after clearing another aircraft for takeoff.
Narrative: This was a frightening misjudgment by controller.[I] arrived at ZZZ [in a] C310. My recollection of communications with Tower may be incorrect.[Runway] XX was the active. One (or maybe two) aircraft were ahead of me and requested [Runway] XY. As I am based at [an FBO]; I too requested [Runway] XY. I entered downwind and was cleared to land. On final; I observed an airliner taking off from [Runway] XX. Initially [I] thought to go around; but [I] was well above the jet as it took off. It was evident I could safely land on [Runway] XY. Then; Tower ordered me to go around; which I did.I was cleared to land and did so without any problem. I asked Tower why the conflict and was told I was too fast. In any case; regardless of airspeed; the controller must have been fully informed. [The controller] told me I was doing 150 [knots]. I doubt that as I do short final at 100 [knots]. While I name [the controller]; I mean no criticism. She was very professional and helpful.Bottom line; fast or not; I find it incomprehensible the controller could clear me to land [Runway] XY and the airliner to takeoff [Runway] XX. As the airliner was on the ground; there could not have been urgency. Takeoff clearance could have been delayed 3 minutes with no significant effect.My suspicion is that the Tower Controller was new and inexperienced.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.