37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1582824 |
Time | |
Date | 201809 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 700 ER/LR (CRJ700) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence |
Narrative:
Windshear was reported; cleared for the visual approach; stable at 1000 feet; windshear warning at about 500feet. I expressed concern for the go around; captain said 'no no; that's a caution message;' landed. I asked captain to explain his actions. Flying into ZZZ we were told there was windshear and windshear conditions reported. The captain was pilot flying and I was pilot monitoring. Upon being told about the conditions I put the continuous ignition on and briefed the captain that if we get a windshear warning that we would go around and fly to the published missed approach point. Once clear for the visual the aircraft was stable at 1000 feet where I made the 1000 foot stable call out. Around 500 feet the windshear aural alarm went off with the warnings displayed on the pfd. I said 'are you not going to go around;' the captain said 'no that's a caution' and continued to then land. Once on the ground walking through the airport I pulled the captain aside and asked him to explain why he chose to continue to land when I thought that the indications that the plane was giving us was a warning in which we needed to execute a go around procedure. He explained his reasoning as to why he thought it was a caution that was being displayed. I expressed why I thought it was incorrect and the conversation ended. Getting back to hotel room I researched what I found to be that I was correct in the sense that the alarms and messages were for a windshear warning and we should have gone around. I could have been more assertive to make the captain go around.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CRJ-700 First Officer reported that Captain failed to execute a go around after receiving a windshear alert.
Narrative: Windshear was reported; cleared for the visual approach; stable at 1000 feet; windshear warning at about 500feet. I expressed concern for the go around; Captain said 'no no; that's a caution message;' landed. I asked Captain to explain his actions. Flying into ZZZ we were told there was windshear and windshear conditions reported. The Captain was pilot flying and I was pilot monitoring. Upon being told about the conditions I put the continuous ignition on and briefed the Captain that if we get a windshear warning that we would go around and fly to the published missed approach point. Once clear for the visual the aircraft was stable at 1000 feet where I made the 1000 foot stable call out. Around 500 feet the windshear aural alarm went off with the warnings displayed on the PFD. I said 'are you not going to go around;' the Captain said 'no that's a caution' and continued to then land. Once on the ground walking through the airport I pulled the Captain aside and asked him to explain why he chose to continue to land when I thought that the indications that the plane was giving us was a warning in which we needed to execute a go around procedure. He explained his reasoning as to why he thought it was a caution that was being displayed. I expressed why I thought it was incorrect and the conversation ended. Getting back to hotel room I researched what I found to be that I was correct in the sense that the alarms and messages were for a windshear warning and we should have gone around. I could have been more assertive to make the Captain go around.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.