37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1604924 |
Time | |
Date | 201812 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Flap Control (Trailing & Leading Edge) |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 156.85 Flight Crew Total 4543.05 Flight Crew Type 4543.05 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying First Officer |
Qualification | Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Instrument |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 135.35 Flight Crew Total 1870.18 Flight Crew Type 1056.52 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter Unstabilized Approach |
Narrative:
Descending into ZZZ and planning a normal flaps landing; speeds 147/142. I was the flying pilot and we were asked to slow from 230 to 170. I called for flaps 5 from 1 and then flaps 10. Speed was too great for flaps 10 so changed it to flaps 5. Right after that; intercepted the glideslope and called for gear down; flaps 15; and then flaps 30 and the landing check. As he was doing the landing checklist; first officer pointed out that we had a green light; but flaps were indicating 5. I verified this and though the airplane was handling like it was in final landing configuration; I checked the overhead and it showed leading edge devices were in the intermediate position. Not being able to verify which was true; called for a go around at 1;200 feet AGL and told tower. Normal go around was accomplished and flaps retracted normally. As we flew the heading and altitude; discussed what we would do if flaps didn't come down. We discussed getting flaps to 10 early to make sure it wasn't a system issue; and everything worked and we accomplished a normal landing. QRH was looked at on the ground; trailing edge flaps disagree was followed with the go around; and with what was going on felt best option was to go around and start again.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737 flight crew reported a flap extension error on approach leading to a go around.
Narrative: Descending into ZZZ and planning a normal Flaps landing; speeds 147/142. I was the Flying Pilot and we were asked to slow from 230 to 170. I called for flaps 5 from 1 and then flaps 10. Speed was too great for flaps 10 so changed it to flaps 5. Right after that; intercepted the glideslope and called for gear down; flaps 15; and then flaps 30 and the landing check. As he was doing the Landing Checklist; First Officer pointed out that we had a green light; but flaps were indicating 5. I verified this and though the airplane was handling like it was in final landing configuration; I checked the overhead and it showed leading edge devices were in the intermediate position. Not being able to verify which was true; called for a go around at 1;200 feet AGL and told Tower. Normal go around was accomplished and flaps retracted normally. As we flew the heading and altitude; discussed what we would do if flaps didn't come down. We discussed getting flaps to 10 early to make sure it wasn't a system issue; and everything worked and we accomplished a normal landing. QRH was looked at on the ground; trailing edge flaps disagree was followed with the go around; and with what was going on felt best option was to go around and start again.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.