Narrative:

We were on arrival into ZZZ at 6;000 MSL when ATC requested speed 190 knots. The PF (pilot flying) called for flaps 1. Shortly thereafter we received a slat fail EICAS message. The pm (pilot monitoring) gave radios to PF and ran QRH slat fail which lead to QRH flap fail (slat fail). PF requested delay vectors and informed ATC of our issue. We were unsuccessful at clearing the EICAS message and therefore prepped for landing with slat 0 and flap 1. We did our best to follow QRH accurately without rushing however we were mindful of our fuel situation that showed landing with 2;800 pounds. At that time we requested the longer runway xxl. We calculated approximately 6;000 feet of required landing distance; runway xxl is [nearly double that.]we asked ATC to update our company; we didn't have time to send them an ACARS due to our limited fuel; we prioritized landing safely. It was raining and 800 feet broken in ZZZ. We updated our flight attendants and made a PA to passengers about the emergency and our higher landing speed.we landed uneventfully and taxied to gate without overheated brakes. We contacted company dispatch; chief pilot; and maintenance to write up slat fail.first officer (first officer) and I called in fatigued thinking it would be safest to not fly our [next] leg of the night and get some rest. We were grateful for the safe outcome and appreciate the help from ATC; our crew; and passengers.ATC asked us to keep our speed up for sequencing and we felt a little pressure from that but we ended up saying unable. We wanted to make sure we would be able to slow to the appropriate approach speed for a safe outcome. After landing we did not see fire trucks; in hindsight we could have requested them specifically just in case our brakes got too hot causing a need for arff (airport rescue and fire fighting.) we expected trucks to be rolling when we landed.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: EMB-175 flight crew reported receiving an EICAS message for SLAT FAIL on approach.

Narrative: We were on arrival into ZZZ at 6;000 MSL when ATC requested speed 190 knots. The PF (Pilot Flying) called for flaps 1. Shortly thereafter we received a SLAT FAIL EICAS message. The PM (Pilot Monitoring) gave radios to PF and ran QRH SLAT FAIL which lead to QRH FLAP FAIL (SLAT FAIL). PF requested delay vectors and informed ATC of our issue. We were unsuccessful at clearing the EICAS message and therefore prepped for landing with SLAT 0 and FLAP 1. We did our best to follow QRH accurately without rushing however we were mindful of our fuel situation that showed landing with 2;800 pounds. At that time we requested the longer runway XXL. We calculated approximately 6;000 feet of required landing distance; runway XXL is [nearly double that.]We asked ATC to update our company; we didn't have time to send them an ACARS due to our limited fuel; we prioritized landing safely. It was raining and 800 feet broken in ZZZ. We updated our flight attendants and made a PA to passengers about the emergency and our higher landing speed.We landed uneventfully and taxied to gate without overheated brakes. We contacted company Dispatch; Chief Pilot; and Maintenance to write up SLAT FAIL.FO (First Officer) and I called in fatigued thinking it would be safest to not fly our [next] leg of the night and get some rest. We were grateful for the safe outcome and appreciate the help from ATC; our crew; and passengers.ATC asked us to keep our speed up for sequencing and we felt a little pressure from that but we ended up saying unable. We wanted to make sure we would be able to slow to the appropriate approach speed for a safe outcome. After landing we did not see fire trucks; in hindsight we could have requested them specifically just in case our brakes got too hot causing a need for ARFF (Airport Rescue and Fire Fighting.) We expected trucks to be rolling when we landed.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.