37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1652368 |
Time | |
Date | 201906 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | AVQ.Airport |
State Reference | AZ |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Flight Plan | None |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Person 1 | |
Function | Instructor |
Qualification | Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 130 Flight Crew Total 930 Flight Crew Type 850 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Conflict NMAC Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Miss Distance | Horizontal 200 Vertical 0 |
Narrative:
The following occurred at avq. It involved two aircraft: aircraft X (me) and aircraft Y (student solo). My student and I were flying the GPS 21 practice approach; circle-to-land runway 12 at avq. Aircraft Y was inbound for a landing; planning on making a 45 degree entry to the left downwind for runway 12. We passed below aircraft Y by approximately 800 feet while over the highway about 3.5 nm northeast of the airport. We were between the fimtu and duyed way point on the approach and aircraft Y was southbound towards the cement plant VFR way point. Both aircraft reported the other in sight and planned for aircraft Y to follow behind [us] when making their entry. Both aircraft reported entering the downwind at the same time. [We were] at circling minimums; 2640 feet MSL. On tis (traffic information service); aircraft Y appeared to be at the same altitude. Aircraft Y reported having [us] in sight and slightly above and behind; and planned to extend downwind to make proper spacing. We reported starting to make a base turn early to help with spacing. As we began the turn towards base; we saw aircraft Y at the same altitude approximately 100-200 feet directly abeam us to our right. I took the controls from my student and continued the turn towards the base as aircraft Y turned right and reported that they were exiting the pattern to try again. Aircraft Y reported unsuccessfully entering the pattern again as we completed our touch-and-go. As we were departing the traffic pattern; aircraft Y reported to be maneuvering again to try and enter the traffic pattern. Aircraft Y did not identify as a solo student until after the near miss when queried by the CFI on aircraft X.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: C172 flight instructor reported a traffic pattern conflict with a solo student pilot at AVQ; a non-towered airport.
Narrative: The following occurred at AVQ. It involved two aircraft: Aircraft X (me) and Aircraft Y (student solo). My student and I were flying the GPS 21 practice approach; circle-to-land Runway 12 at AVQ. Aircraft Y was inbound for a landing; planning on making a 45 degree entry to the left downwind for Runway 12. We passed below Aircraft Y by approximately 800 feet while over the highway about 3.5 nm northeast of the airport. We were between the FIMTU and DUYED way point on the approach and Aircraft Y was southbound towards the Cement Plant VFR way point. Both aircraft reported the other in sight and planned for Aircraft Y to follow behind [us] when making their entry. Both aircraft reported entering the downwind at the same time. [We were] at circling minimums; 2640 feet MSL. On TIS (Traffic Information Service); Aircraft Y appeared to be at the same altitude. Aircraft Y reported having [us] in sight and slightly above and behind; and planned to extend downwind to make proper spacing. We reported starting to make a base turn early to help with spacing. As we began the turn towards base; we saw Aircraft Y at the same altitude approximately 100-200 feet directly abeam us to our right. I took the controls from my student and continued the turn towards the base as Aircraft Y turned right and reported that they were exiting the pattern to try again. Aircraft Y reported unsuccessfully entering the pattern again as we completed our touch-and-go. As we were departing the traffic pattern; Aircraft Y reported to be maneuvering again to try and enter the traffic pattern. Aircraft Y did not identify as a solo student until after the near miss when queried by the CFI on Aircraft X.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.