37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1671702 |
Time | |
Date | 201907 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Seaplane or Amphibian |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Captain Single Pilot |
Qualification | Flight Crew Sea Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 16 Flight Crew Total 4052 Flight Crew Type 3834 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Inflight Event / Encounter Loss Of Aircraft Control Inflight Event / Encounter Object |
Narrative:
I was returning to ZZZ from ZZZ1 and encountered a turbulent down rotor on landing approach to a seaplane base. As a result; the aircraft dropped abruptly and struck the top of a lone 120 ft. Tall tree with left wing; about 1/2 way out. There was no loss of control because of the tree strike; and despite damage to left wing; aircraft flew well; to an uneventful water landing. The damage is confined to the leading edge of the wing; invoking dented and torn skin between two ribs (about 2 ft.); and slight damage to the leading edge of both of those ribs. There were no injuries to the persons on board. Winds were 10-15 kts. Coming over a 500 ft. Hill; so no turbulence this strong was expected. A higher gust must have formed between the two adjacent ridges to explain the down draft. I have [numerous] years and 100's of hours flying seaplanes in the [area]; although I have done most of my flying in [state].as seaplane pilots we are taught to come in low over lake shore trees to minimize the distance required for landings; because there are no distance markers on water; and every 50 ft. Of altitude over the trees means up to 1;000 ft. Of lake needed to land. I believe I'll stay a bit higher over the trees in mountainous areas in the future.I apologize if this incident doesn't qualify for a report; but as is usual in seaplane flying; everything seems to be a 'gray area'.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Seaplane pilot reported clipping a tree while attempting to land in the water.
Narrative: I was returning to ZZZ from ZZZ1 and encountered a turbulent down rotor on landing approach to a seaplane base. As a result; the aircraft dropped abruptly and struck the top of a lone 120 ft. tall tree with left wing; about 1/2 way out. There was no loss of control because of the tree strike; and despite damage to left wing; aircraft flew well; to an uneventful water landing. The damage is confined to the leading edge of the wing; invoking dented and torn skin between two ribs (about 2 ft.); and slight damage to the leading edge of both of those ribs. There were no injuries to the persons on board. Winds were 10-15 kts. coming over a 500 ft. hill; so no turbulence this strong was expected. A higher gust must have formed between the two adjacent ridges to explain the down draft. I have [numerous] years and 100's of hours flying seaplanes in the [area]; although I have done most of my flying in [state].As seaplane pilots we are taught to come in low over lake shore trees to minimize the distance required for landings; because there are no distance markers on water; and every 50 ft. of altitude over the trees means up to 1;000 ft. of lake needed to land. I believe I'll stay a bit higher over the trees in mountainous areas in the future.I apologize if this incident doesn't qualify for a report; but as is usual in seaplane flying; everything seems to be a 'gray area'.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.