Narrative:

We were on V372 east of hdf at 14000' en route to orange county airport, working ontario approach control. We were given direct kayoh, expect lower in 5 mi. Shortly after that clearance, we were advised of another air carrier medium large transport was at one O'clock sebnd climbing to 13000'. Moments later, we received a traffic alert on the TCAS. The traffic appeared ahead at one O'clock and climbing, 1100' below, then 1000' below. The directional arrow disappeared. We then received a resolution advisory, climb, climb, climb. Our TCAS philosophy requires that, unless the safe operation of the aircraft is jeopardized, we comply with the RA. The first officer was flying the aircraft with the autoplt engaged. I then asked him to disconnect the autoplt and comply with the RA, which resulted in an altitude deviation of 750' (14750'). The TCAS then commanded monitor vertical speed and he returned to 14000'. I reported the altitude deviation to ontario approach and that we were complying with a TCAS RA. His comment was that this was something we were all going to have to learn to work with. We did not feel that an actual conflict existed but time did not permit a complete analysis of the situation. Supplemental information from acn 168992. The captain notified approach control, who was unaware of the situation, but stated 'no problem, I'm not familiar with TCAS, but I guess we will all have to get used to it.'

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ALT DEVIATION ALT EXCURSION IN RESPONSE TO A TCAS II ALERT.

Narrative: WE WERE ON V372 E OF HDF AT 14000' ENRTE TO ORANGE COUNTY ARPT, WORKING ONTARIO APCH CTL. WE WERE GIVEN DIRECT KAYOH, EXPECT LOWER IN 5 MI. SHORTLY AFTER THAT CLRNC, WE WERE ADVISED OF ANOTHER ACR MLG WAS AT ONE O'CLOCK SEBND CLBING TO 13000'. MOMENTS LATER, WE RECEIVED A TFC ALERT ON THE TCAS. THE TFC APPEARED AHEAD AT ONE O'CLOCK AND CLBING, 1100' BELOW, THEN 1000' BELOW. THE DIRECTIONAL ARROW DISAPPEARED. WE THEN RECEIVED A RESOLUTION ADVISORY, CLB, CLB, CLB. OUR TCAS PHILOSOPHY REQUIRES THAT, UNLESS THE SAFE OPERATION OF THE ACFT IS JEOPARDIZED, WE COMPLY WITH THE RA. THE F/O WAS FLYING THE ACFT WITH THE AUTOPLT ENGAGED. I THEN ASKED HIM TO DISCONNECT THE AUTOPLT AND COMPLY WITH THE RA, WHICH RESULTED IN AN ALT DEV OF 750' (14750'). THE TCAS THEN COMMANDED MONITOR VERTICAL SPD AND HE RETURNED TO 14000'. I RPTED THE ALT DEV TO ONTARIO APCH AND THAT WE WERE COMPLYING WITH A TCAS RA. HIS COMMENT WAS THAT THIS WAS SOMETHING WE WERE ALL GOING TO HAVE TO LEARN TO WORK WITH. WE DID NOT FEEL THAT AN ACTUAL CONFLICT EXISTED BUT TIME DID NOT PERMIT A COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF THE SITUATION. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 168992. THE CAPT NOTIFIED APCH CTL, WHO WAS UNAWARE OF THE SITUATION, BUT STATED 'NO PROB, I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH TCAS, BUT I GUESS WE WILL ALL HAVE TO GET USED TO IT.'

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.