37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1688637 |
Time | |
Date | 201909 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | JFK.Airport |
State Reference | NY |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Parked |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Fuselage |
Person 1 | |
Function | Technician |
Qualification | Maintenance Powerplant Maintenance Airframe |
Person 2 | |
Function | Technician |
Qualification | Maintenance Airframe Maintenance Powerplant |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Maintenance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter Bird / Animal |
Narrative:
My partner and I were assigned to do an ETOPS inspection on aircraft X. While doing our walk around; we found evidence of a bird strike on the first officer's side; aft of the radome; and before the pitot tubes. At that time we told our crew chief; and supervisor that we had the item; and our crew chief pulled up the bird strike inspection paperwork. While accomplishing the card; step 5; tells us to deactivate the gcs antenna; or to [skip] this if no indication of bird strike on the crown. The issue with this is we're told in step 2 to do an inspection from the ground (in which case; you can't see the crown of the airplane). The next item we had; was step 7 (in the notes) that 'if gcs is installed; inspect the gcs antenna radome. When we pulled that amm (aircraft maintenance manual) reference; this was a detailed inspection; of which the antenna needed to be removed to properly inspect it. We then contacted engineering; for relief from these items; as we could not accomplish them as they were written. An engineering authorization was issued. We thought nothing of this; until we were brought in today to do the 5 question part of the investigation form; by manager. We found this odd; as he was present at the time this issue was developing; and our understanding; was that anyone involved in the issue; and wouldn't be involved in the investigation form process.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Technician reported a procedural deficiency in the Aircraft Maintenance Manual that required an Engineering Authorization.
Narrative: My partner and I were assigned to do an ETOPS inspection on Aircraft X. While doing our walk around; we found evidence of a bird strike on the First Officer's side; aft of the radome; and before the pitot tubes. At that time we told our Crew Chief; and Supervisor that we had the item; and our crew chief pulled up the bird strike inspection paperwork. While accomplishing the card; Step 5; tells us to deactivate the GCS antenna; or to [skip] this if no indication of bird strike on the crown. The issue with this is we're told in step 2 to do an inspection from the ground (in which case; you can't see the crown of the airplane). The next item we had; was step 7 (in the notes) that 'If GCS is installed; inspect the GCS Antenna Radome. When we pulled that AMM (Aircraft Maintenance Manual) reference; this was a detailed inspection; of which the antenna needed to be removed to properly inspect it. We then contacted engineering; for relief from these items; as we could not accomplish them as they were written. An Engineering Authorization was issued. We thought nothing of this; until we were brought in today to do the 5 question part of the Investigation Form; by Manager. We found this odd; as he was present at the time this issue was developing; and our understanding; was that anyone involved in the issue; and wouldn't be involved in the Investigation Form process.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.