37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1745272 |
Time | |
Date | 202006 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | MDW.Tower |
State Reference | IL |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Challenger 300 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Takeoff |
Route In Use | Vectors SID Midway 5 |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 26 Flight Crew Total 6000 Flight Crew Type 150 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
My co-pilot and I both agree that the midway 5 departure at mdw is confusing at best. The chart says that you have to maintain a heading until turning to a new heading. What isn't clear is that you will get an assigned heading by the tower. But a new heading assigned by the tower should supersede all other clearances; right? So midway tower should say comply with the SID and then turn to a heading. My other argument is that most departures are either all long range navigation (navigation) or a heading (heading). This is an airport where you take off in navigation and have the added switch to heading almost immediately. This is an added step out of the normal sequence of events for our departures. I am not in favor of that; especially in a crowded airspace when our workload is the highest. The midway 5 should be an all navigation with clear expectations for the airplanes to comply.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CL30 Captain reported confusion over the wording of a SID.
Narrative: My Co-pilot and I both agree that the Midway 5 Departure at MDW is confusing at best. The chart says that you have to maintain a heading until turning to a new heading. What isn't clear is that you will get an assigned heading by the tower. But a new heading assigned by the tower should supersede all other clearances; right? So Midway Tower should say comply with the SID and then turn to a heading. My other argument is that most departures are either all long range navigation (NAV) or a heading (HDG). This is an airport where you take off in NAV and have the added switch to HDG almost immediately. This is an added step out of the normal sequence of events for our departures. I am not in favor of that; especially in a crowded airspace when our workload is the highest. The Midway 5 should be an all NAV with clear expectations for the airplanes to comply.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.