37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1753229 |
Time | |
Date | 202007 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737-700 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Parked |
Route In Use | Vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 60 Flight Crew Type 6884 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural FAR Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Procedural Clearance Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence |
Narrative:
ZZZ tower was closed for early morning departure. Visibility was fluctuating between 1/4 and 1/16. A takeoff alternate was needed and obtained from dispatch. We determined that 1/4 visibility was needed to takeoff because the tower was closed and automated weather did not report RVR. We pushed and taxied with the understanding that we would not takeoff until the visibility was 1/4 or better. While waiting at the end of the runway; dispatch sent an ACARS message with RVR values. As we discussed the legality of that information; the reported visibility improved to better than 1/4. We departed without incident. I don't know of any errors that were made. If we can legally take off with dispatch reported RVR; then we were only delayed an additional three to five minutes unnecessarily. There are obvious references to dispatch weather in the manual especially for arrival weather. However; it was not so obvious for this exact scenario.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Flight Crew reported departing airport late due to lack of RVR values and below minimum weather.
Narrative: ZZZ Tower was closed for early morning departure. Visibility was fluctuating between 1/4 and 1/16. A takeoff alternate was needed and obtained from Dispatch. We determined that 1/4 visibility was needed to takeoff because the Tower was closed and automated weather did not report RVR. We pushed and taxied with the understanding that we would not takeoff until the visibility was 1/4 or better. While waiting at the end of the runway; Dispatch sent an ACARS message with RVR values. As we discussed the legality of that information; the reported visibility improved to better than 1/4. We departed without incident. I don't know of any errors that were made. If we can legally take off with Dispatch reported RVR; then we were only delayed an additional three to five minutes unnecessarily. There are obvious references to Dispatch weather in the manual especially for arrival weather. However; it was not so obvious for this exact scenario.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.