Narrative:

We departed ZZZ; runway X; on the SID (standard instrument departure). Unfortunately we did not catch that the SID runway X is not authorized for use by aircraft X make/model. There are several holes (traps) that we missed. We received an ATC (air traffic control) uplink with the SID. In later crew discussion - we believe that this was based on our originally planned runway 1 departure.our flight was originally flight planned for runway Y; via the SID. With a late ZFW (zero fuel weight) increase the working international relief officer (international relief officer) pointed out that we were no longer good to take off on runway Y; that we needed runway X. We asked ATC and were cleared out to runway X.the takeoff and departure was normal and accomplished with SOP's; with no traffic or navigation conflicts. ATC never said anything about our departure. We didn't see any restrictions on the jeppesen SID page. I forgot to re-check the 10-7 pages for departure notes after the runway change. None of us caught the note on the page that the SID is not authorized for aircraft X make/model on runway X.on the climb portion; after the turn to the northeasterly portion of the SID (at approximately 5;000 ft.) - the working international relief officer mentioned that we were not authorized to use the departure that we were already on. We had a quick look and since all elements of the flight appeared normal; we decided to discuss it later in the flight.we continued on and the flight was terminated in ZZZZ with no further issues or problems. ATC never queried us and I told the crew that I would be filing a report on our return.also - I am a relatively new transfer to the ZZZ base; having been displaced recently. When I flew out of ZZZ we never used runway Y. So I was probably predisposed to use runway X; and my expectation bias likely had me trusting the ATC upload as valid and legal for the runway as well.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: Air carrier flight crew reported inadvertently using an unauthorized departure route for their aircraft type.

Narrative: We departed ZZZ; Runway X; on the SID (Standard Instrument Departure). Unfortunately we did not catch that the SID Runway X is not authorized for use by Aircraft X Make/Model. There are several holes (traps) that we missed. We received an ATC (Air Traffic Control) uplink with the SID. In later crew discussion - we believe that this was based on our originally planned runway 1 departure.Our flight was originally flight planned for Runway Y; via the SID. With a late ZFW (Zero Fuel Weight) increase the working IRO (International Relief Officer) pointed out that we were no longer good to take off on Runway Y; that we needed Runway X. We asked ATC and were cleared out to Runway X.The takeoff and departure was normal and accomplished with SOP's; with no traffic or navigation conflicts. ATC never said anything about our departure. We didn't see any restrictions on the Jeppesen SID page. I forgot to re-check the 10-7 pages for departure notes after the runway change. None of us caught the note on the page that the SID is not authorized for Aircraft X Make/Model on Runway X.On the climb portion; after the turn to the northeasterly portion of the SID (at approximately 5;000 ft.) - the working IRO mentioned that we were not authorized to use the departure that we were already on. We had a quick look and since all elements of the flight appeared normal; we decided to discuss it later in the flight.We continued on and the flight was terminated in ZZZZ with no further issues or problems. ATC never queried us and I told the crew that I would be filing a report on our return.Also - I am a relatively new transfer to the ZZZ base; having been displaced recently. When I flew out of ZZZ we never used Runway Y. So I was probably predisposed to use Runway X; and my expectation bias likely had me trusting the ATC upload as valid and legal for the runway as well.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.