37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 180908 |
Time | |
Date | 199106 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : jfk |
State Reference | NY |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 300 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : jfk |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Widebody, Low Wing, 3 Turbojet Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach descent other landing other |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Experience | controller non radar : 3 controller supervisory : 1 flight time last 90 days : 60 flight time total : 8500 flight time type : 1200 |
ASRS Report | 180908 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : runway non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
We were landing after an all-nighter. The captain was new to the aircraft as was the second officer. We were instructed to execute the VOR 13R approach (canarsie). Passing the VOR we acquired 'the lead-in lights' and continued to the runway. Unfortunately these lead-INS go to 13L, we never saw the 13R lead-INS. At 300' we realized that we were lined up for the wrong runway and asked tower if 13L would be ok. He said yes. We landed on 13L uneventfully but a bit shaken. We thought that the lead-INS would only be for the runway in use, wrong! We were landing into the morning sun and couldn't see well anyway. Additionally, we were tired from the all-nighter. The canarsie is an unsafe approach under idea conditions. I don't think it is safe to have the lead-in lights on for a runway not in use. This approach completely disregards the stabilized approach concept. This approach should be discontinued in my opinion.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACR WDB WRONG RWY APCH LNDG FROM A CANARSIE VISUAL TO RWY 13R AT JFK.
Narrative: WE WERE LNDG AFTER AN ALL-NIGHTER. THE CAPT WAS NEW TO THE ACFT AS WAS THE S/O. WE WERE INSTRUCTED TO EXECUTE THE VOR 13R APCH (CANARSIE). PASSING THE VOR WE ACQUIRED 'THE LEAD-IN LIGHTS' AND CONTINUED TO THE RWY. UNFORTUNATELY THESE LEAD-INS GO TO 13L, WE NEVER SAW THE 13R LEAD-INS. AT 300' WE REALIZED THAT WE WERE LINED UP FOR THE WRONG RWY AND ASKED TWR IF 13L WOULD BE OK. HE SAID YES. WE LANDED ON 13L UNEVENTFULLY BUT A BIT SHAKEN. WE THOUGHT THAT THE LEAD-INS WOULD ONLY BE FOR THE RWY IN USE, WRONG! WE WERE LNDG INTO THE MORNING SUN AND COULDN'T SEE WELL ANYWAY. ADDITIONALLY, WE WERE TIRED FROM THE ALL-NIGHTER. THE CANARSIE IS AN UNSAFE APCH UNDER IDEA CONDITIONS. I DON'T THINK IT IS SAFE TO HAVE THE LEAD-IN LIGHTS ON FOR A RWY NOT IN USE. THIS APCH COMPLETELY DISREGARDS THE STABILIZED APCH CONCEPT. THIS APCH SHOULD BE DISCONTINUED IN MY OPINION.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.