37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 182845 |
Time | |
Date | 199105 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : wrl |
State Reference | WY |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 1000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : ftw |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Light Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff landing other other |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : atp pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 240 flight time total : 3500 |
ASRS Report | 182845 |
Person 2 | |
Function | observation : passenger |
Qualification | other |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
As captain of the aircraft I was preparing to run up the aircraft prior to daily scheduled flight. FSS employee wanted to situation in cockpit and observe. We taxied to far end of runway to make less noise for nearest public houses to the airport. While performing the systems check I found that the automatic feather would not ground test. I thought it might be the 90% switch so I decided to fly the aircraft around the pattern once to see if the automatic feather light would come on with the power setting greater than 90%. Following rotation I climbed at about a 30 degree angle to 1000' AGL and made a left crosswind to enter a standard left traffic pattern. At 1000' I pulled the power back and made a normal landing. The problem which I did not think of at the time is that my license does not allow piloting this aircraft west/O a multi engine rated first officer. No problems were encountered during the flight but it has been brought to my attention that the flight was not legal, even though nothing occurred. Now that I realize the mistake I have no intention of abusing my privilege to fly in the future.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: COMMUTER PLT FLEW AN UNAUTH TEST FLT WITHOUT A QUALIFIED FO.
Narrative: AS CAPT OF THE ACFT I WAS PREPARING TO RUN UP THE ACFT PRIOR TO DAILY SCHEDULED FLT. FSS EMPLOYEE WANTED TO SIT IN COCKPIT AND OBSERVE. WE TAXIED TO FAR END OF RWY TO MAKE LESS NOISE FOR NEAREST PUBLIC HOUSES TO THE ARPT. WHILE PERFORMING THE SYSTEMS CHK I FOUND THAT THE AUTO FEATHER WOULD NOT GND TEST. I THOUGHT IT MIGHT BE THE 90% SWITCH SO I DECIDED TO FLY THE ACFT AROUND THE PATTERN ONCE TO SEE IF THE AUTO FEATHER LIGHT WOULD COME ON WITH THE PWR SETTING GREATER THAN 90%. FOLLOWING ROTATION I CLBED AT ABOUT A 30 DEG ANGLE TO 1000' AGL AND MADE A LEFT XWIND TO ENTER A STANDARD LEFT TFC PATTERN. AT 1000' I PULLED THE PWR BACK AND MADE A NORMAL LNDG. THE PROB WHICH I DID NOT THINK OF AT THE TIME IS THAT MY LICENSE DOES NOT ALLOW PILOTING THIS ACFT W/O A MULTI ENG RATED F/O. NO PROBS WERE ENCOUNTERED DURING THE FLT BUT IT HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO MY ATTN THAT THE FLT WAS NOT LEGAL, EVEN THOUGH NOTHING OCCURRED. NOW THAT I REALIZE THE MISTAKE I HAVE NO INTENTION OF ABUSING MY PRIVILEGE TO FLY IN THE FUTURE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.