37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 191096 |
Time | |
Date | 199109 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : cae |
State Reference | SC |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | Small Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Flight Phase | ground : preflight |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 15 flight time total : 6500 flight time type : 200 |
ASRS Report | 191096 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | other personnel |
Qualification | other other : other |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other other : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
In process of placing an small transport into charter service aircraft logs originally inspected by director of operations (myself) and director of maintenance with no items found. Aircraft records again inspected by FAA FSDO personnel 9/tue/91 with no items found. On 10/wed/91 the aircraft with myself and 2 other pilots went to FAA for check rides, at this time FAA maintenance personnel (the same person) found an ad outstanding. The following day a ferry permit was obtained to the repair station which performed the last inspection. In our after the fact research another ad was found not properly signed off. The ad had in fact not been completed with and was taken care of while we waited. 91.417 (a)(2)(V) is very specific about how ad's should be recorded however, after 30 hours of research plus review by the FAA items are still missed because of lack of standardization of recording procedures! I have discussed this with our maintenance inspector and he smiles and says it's our problem. I feel strongly the FAA should mandate the format as they mandate the ad's on aircraft such as a 20 yr old small transport where ad recording format has changed 3 or 4 times it is impossible to absolutely verify all that's been done!
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FSDO INSPECTOR DISCOVERED ACFT AD NOT COMPLETED AS ACFT WAS PRESENTED FOR A PLT CHK RIDE AND CERTIFICATION FOR CHARTER OP.
Narrative: IN PROCESS OF PLACING AN SMT INTO CHARTER SVC ACFT LOGS ORIGINALLY INSPECTED BY DIRECTOR OF OPS (MYSELF) AND DIRECTOR OF MAINT WITH NO ITEMS FOUND. ACFT RECORDS AGAIN INSPECTED BY FAA FSDO PERSONNEL 9/TUE/91 WITH NO ITEMS FOUND. ON 10/WED/91 THE ACFT WITH MYSELF AND 2 OTHER PLTS WENT TO FAA FOR CHK RIDES, AT THIS TIME FAA MAINT PERSONNEL (THE SAME PERSON) FOUND AN AD OUTSTANDING. THE FOLLOWING DAY A FERRY PERMIT WAS OBTAINED TO THE REPAIR STATION WHICH PERFORMED THE LAST INSPECTION. IN OUR AFTER THE FACT RESEARCH ANOTHER AD WAS FOUND NOT PROPERLY SIGNED OFF. THE AD HAD IN FACT NOT BEEN COMPLETED WITH AND WAS TAKEN CARE OF WHILE WE WAITED. 91.417 (A)(2)(V) IS VERY SPECIFIC ABOUT HOW AD'S SHOULD BE RECORDED HOWEVER, AFTER 30 HRS OF RESEARCH PLUS REVIEW BY THE FAA ITEMS ARE STILL MISSED BECAUSE OF LACK OF STANDARDIZATION OF RECORDING PROCS! I HAVE DISCUSSED THIS WITH OUR MAINT INSPECTOR AND HE SMILES AND SAYS IT'S OUR PROBLEM. I FEEL STRONGLY THE FAA SHOULD MANDATE THE FORMAT AS THEY MANDATE THE AD'S ON ACFT SUCH AS A 20 YR OLD SMT WHERE AD RECORDING FORMAT HAS CHANGED 3 OR 4 TIMES IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO ABSOLUTELY VERIFY ALL THAT'S BEEN DONE!
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.