Narrative:

On climb out of lga the instructions were followed to turn from 175 degree heading to 040 degree heading as soon as 2.5 DME was reached. Since we were fairly heavy the flap retraction schedule delayed our bank beyond company procedure 15 degrees. Once flaps were retracted the captain chose a conservative 20 degree bank due to weight. There was a complaint from nyc departure control that we impeded jfk airspace by 2 mi followed by another vector around other traffic. Vzf as per our manual was flown. All that could have been changed was bank angle up to 30 degrees. Even then, a 2 mi correction wouldn't have been achieved. I recommend reviewing the climb procedure, particularly for heavy aircraft.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACR VERY HVY UNABLE TO COMPLY WITH COMPANY PROC REF FLAP RETRACTION AND SID PROC AT SAME TIME.

Narrative: ON CLBOUT OF LGA THE INSTRUCTIONS WERE FOLLOWED TO TURN FROM 175 DEG HDG TO 040 DEG HDG AS SOON AS 2.5 DME WAS REACHED. SINCE WE WERE FAIRLY HVY THE FLAP RETRACTION SCHEDULE DELAYED OUR BANK BEYOND COMPANY PROC 15 DEGS. ONCE FLAPS WERE RETRACTED THE CAPT CHOSE A CONSERVATIVE 20 DEG BANK DUE TO WT. THERE WAS A COMPLAINT FROM NYC DEP CTL THAT WE IMPEDED JFK AIRSPACE BY 2 MI FOLLOWED BY ANOTHER VECTOR AROUND OTHER TFC. VZF AS PER OUR MANUAL WAS FLOWN. ALL THAT COULD HAVE BEEN CHANGED WAS BANK ANGLE UP TO 30 DEGS. EVEN THEN, A 2 MI CORRECTION WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN ACHIEVED. I RECOMMEND REVIEWING THE CLB PROC, PARTICULARLY FOR HVY ACFT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.