37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 202464 |
Time | |
Date | 199202 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : den |
State Reference | CO |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : den |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | Light Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing other |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 75 flight time total : 11000 flight time type : 5000 |
ASRS Report | 202464 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : landing without clearance |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Visual conditions. Field in sight. Requested intercept ILS to check autoplt coupler. Cleared to intercept and cleared for the approach. Involved with troubleshooting autoplt coupler did not notice that we were not told to contact tower. Realized situation on short final. Completed normal landing and contacted tower. Directed to taxi to ramp. No problem indicated by tower. Should not let maintenance concerns distract from flying job. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter states major problem was checking the coupler of the autoplt. Secondly reporter training new first officer. Combination distraction enough so that he did not recognize they had not received handoff. Feels the request for out of ordinary approach whereby they were vectored to cross behind air carrier on approach for 26R so they could do coupled approach on 26L may have distracted controller so handoff was never given. He changed frequency on short final but did not communicate at that time. Local controller said nothing about lack of contact.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CORP ACFT ON ILS APCH DID NOT RECEIVE HDOF. LAND WITHOUT CLRNC.
Narrative: VISUAL CONDITIONS. FIELD IN SIGHT. REQUESTED INTERCEPT ILS TO CHK AUTOPLT COUPLER. CLRED TO INTERCEPT AND CLRED FOR THE APCH. INVOLVED WITH TROUBLESHOOTING AUTOPLT COUPLER DID NOT NOTICE THAT WE WERE NOT TOLD TO CONTACT TWR. REALIZED SITUATION ON SHORT FINAL. COMPLETED NORMAL LNDG AND CONTACTED TWR. DIRECTED TO TAXI TO RAMP. NO PROBLEM INDICATED BY TWR. SHOULD NOT LET MAINT CONCERNS DISTRACT FROM FLYING JOB. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR STATES MAJOR PROBLEM WAS CHKING THE COUPLER OF THE AUTOPLT. SECONDLY RPTR TRAINING NEW FO. COMBINATION DISTR ENOUGH SO THAT HE DID NOT RECOGNIZE THEY HAD NOT RECEIVED HDOF. FEELS THE REQUEST FOR OUT OF ORDINARY APCH WHEREBY THEY WERE VECTORED TO CROSS BEHIND ACR ON APCH FOR 26R SO THEY COULD DO COUPLED APCH ON 26L MAY HAVE DISTRACTED CTLR SO HDOF WAS NEVER GIVEN. HE CHANGED FREQ ON SHORT FINAL BUT DID NOT COMMUNICATE AT THAT TIME. LCL CTLR SAID NOTHING ABOUT LACK OF CONTACT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.