37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 210424 |
Time | |
Date | 199205 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : yyr |
State Reference | NF |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 37000 msl bound upper : 37000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : czqx |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Widebody, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Route In Use | enroute : atlantic enroute : other oceanic |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | other personnel |
Qualification | other |
ASRS Report | 210424 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : declared emergency flight crew : overcame equipment problem |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
The flight was en route from ord to zrh. This was a widebody transport on an extended range overwater flight. Approximately over yul, the flight called and advised one of the engine driven generators had failed. At that time, I contacted maintenance and they suggested we land the aircraft short. I then referred to the aircraft operating manual and determined the flight could continue. I relayed this to the crew and the captain concurred. Just prior to the overwater portion, the flight again contacted me and advised the EICAS was displaying an intermittent status message on the APU oil quantity. I called maintenance and they advised there was a history of oil problems with the APU. They again suggested we land short. I contacted the flight and advised the crew of the history on the APU. At that point, I suggested landing at jfk. The captain felt comfortable to continue. We then discussed our options should the APU fail. Approximately 300 NM from that point, the APU failed. The captain declared an emergency and diverted to yyr. It is my opinion that the captain and I made sound decisions and operated the flight safely and legally.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN EXTENDED RANGE WDB CREW HAD A LOSS OF 1 GENERATOR, THEN THE APU. THEY LANDED WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT AT AN ENRTE FIELD.
Narrative: THE FLT WAS ENRTE FROM ORD TO ZRH. THIS WAS A WDB ON AN EXTENDED RANGE OVERWATER FLT. APPROX OVER YUL, THE FLT CALLED AND ADVISED ONE OF THE ENG DRIVEN GENERATORS HAD FAILED. AT THAT TIME, I CONTACTED MAINT AND THEY SUGGESTED WE LAND THE ACFT SHORT. I THEN REFERRED TO THE ACFT OPERATING MANUAL AND DETERMINED THE FLT COULD CONTINUE. I RELAYED THIS TO THE CREW AND THE CAPT CONCURRED. JUST PRIOR TO THE OVERWATER PORTION, THE FLT AGAIN CONTACTED ME AND ADVISED THE EICAS WAS DISPLAYING AN INTERMITTENT STATUS MESSAGE ON THE APU OIL QUANTITY. I CALLED MAINT AND THEY ADVISED THERE WAS A HISTORY OF OIL PROBLEMS WITH THE APU. THEY AGAIN SUGGESTED WE LAND SHORT. I CONTACTED THE FLT AND ADVISED THE CREW OF THE HISTORY ON THE APU. AT THAT POINT, I SUGGESTED LNDG AT JFK. THE CAPT FELT COMFORTABLE TO CONTINUE. WE THEN DISCUSSED OUR OPTIONS SHOULD THE APU FAIL. APPROX 300 NM FROM THAT POINT, THE APU FAILED. THE CAPT DECLARED AN EMER AND DIVERTED TO YYR. IT IS MY OPINION THAT THE CAPT AND I MADE SOUND DECISIONS AND OPERATED THE FLT SAFELY AND LEGALLY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.