Narrative:

Small aircraft fuel exhaustion forced landing from 800 ft AGL. I was checking a new private pilot out in her husband's small aircraft. I did not preflight the plane, but did look in the main tanks. Looking in the tanks, I could see the fuel was down 2-3 inches. At that point the engine quit. I had the pilot switch tanks and start dumping the wobble pump. When the engine still didn't restart and we confirmed the gear was down we had no choice but to flare and land. After stopping the engine was running. The fuel was now on the left tank and the gauge showed over 1/2 full. Taxied to the end of the field. Tested it again at full power, and decided it was safe to takeoff. The mechanic found the right bladder has a ridge buckled up from the bottom holding the sender float up and trapping fuel. A loose connection gave false fuel level readings. How problem arose; contributing factors; this situation had the classic chain of events which led to the engine failure, and could have been avoided at any point in the chain. I was checking out my wife (new pilot) in the plane. The aircraft was flown 1:15 mins on MM/dd/92 and was not refueled because the FBO was out of fuel. The aircraft was annualed, then test flown on MM/dd/92 and was not refueled again because the FBO was out of fuel, (the second time). This is unusual for this FBO. Visual inspection of the fuel by myself (CFI) showed the fuel in the mains to be down 2-3 inches. Misunderstanding between the husband, wife (owners) and CFI about how often the plane was flown since the last fill-up, and how much time remained in each tank. Misunderstanding/poor communications en route on which tank to cruise on. Same problem switching tanks entering the pattern, and again on takeoff. An intercom was normally used except on this flight. It was not in the plane after the annual inspection. Failure of the CFI (myself) to visually confirm which tank we had switched to because the selector is located under her left thigh and cannot be seen by the pilot in the right seat without unbuckling the seat belt and getting up out of the seat. An inspection of the exhausted tank's bladder and sending unit showed the bladder buckled up 1 1/4 inch which held the float up and perhaps trapped some fuel behind the ridge, and a loose/poor connection on the fuel sender caused the gauge to show over half full. I have made a fuel dipstick for many of the planes that I fly regularly by draining the tank, and adding 2 gallons at a time, and marking the stick until the tank is full. This plane does not have one yet. I believe this should be provided for all types of aircraft and I have always been amazed that the manufacturer does not make one. Of the 65 different models-types of planes I've flown in the past 15 yrs, the only plane I've seen with a dipstick provided by the manufacturer was a new small aircraft plane.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN SMA INSTRUCTOR PLT RAN A FUEL TANK DRY AND LANDED IN A CORN FIELD. HE CHANGED TO ANOTHER TANK, RAN UP THE ENG, AND RETURNED TO HIS HOME BASE.

Narrative: SMA FUEL EXHAUSTION FORCED LNDG FROM 800 FT AGL. I WAS CHKING A NEW PRIVATE PLT OUT IN HER HUSBAND'S SMA. I DID NOT PREFLT THE PLANE, BUT DID LOOK IN THE MAIN TANKS. LOOKING IN THE TANKS, I COULD SEE THE FUEL WAS DOWN 2-3 INCHES. AT THAT POINT THE ENG QUIT. I HAD THE PLT SWITCH TANKS AND START DUMPING THE WOBBLE PUMP. WHEN THE ENG STILL DIDN'T RESTART AND WE CONFIRMED THE GEAR WAS DOWN WE HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO FLARE AND LAND. AFTER STOPPING THE ENG WAS RUNNING. THE FUEL WAS NOW ON THE L TANK AND THE GAUGE SHOWED OVER 1/2 FULL. TAXIED TO THE END OF THE FIELD. TESTED IT AGAIN AT FULL PWR, AND DECIDED IT WAS SAFE TO TKOF. THE MECH FOUND THE R BLADDER HAS A RIDGE BUCKLED UP FROM THE BOTTOM HOLDING THE SENDER FLOAT UP AND TRAPPING FUEL. A LOOSE CONNECTION GAVE FALSE FUEL LEVEL READINGS. HOW PROBLEM AROSE; CONTRIBUTING FACTORS; THIS SITUATION HAD THE CLASSIC CHAIN OF EVENTS WHICH LED TO THE ENG FAILURE, AND COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED AT ANY POINT IN THE CHAIN. I WAS CHKING OUT MY WIFE (NEW PLT) IN THE PLANE. THE ACFT WAS FLOWN 1:15 MINS ON MM/DD/92 AND WAS NOT REFUELED BECAUSE THE FBO WAS OUT OF FUEL. THE ACFT WAS ANNUALED, THEN TEST FLOWN ON MM/DD/92 AND WAS NOT REFUELED AGAIN BECAUSE THE FBO WAS OUT OF FUEL, (THE SECOND TIME). THIS IS UNUSUAL FOR THIS FBO. VISUAL INSPECTION OF THE FUEL BY MYSELF (CFI) SHOWED THE FUEL IN THE MAINS TO BE DOWN 2-3 INCHES. MISUNDERSTANDING BTWN THE HUSBAND, WIFE (OWNERS) AND CFI ABOUT HOW OFTEN THE PLANE WAS FLOWN SINCE THE LAST FILL-UP, AND HOW MUCH TIME REMAINED IN EACH TANK. MISUNDERSTANDING/POOR COMS ENRTE ON WHICH TANK TO CRUISE ON. SAME PROBLEM SWITCHING TANKS ENTERING THE PATTERN, AND AGAIN ON TKOF. AN INTERCOM WAS NORMALLY USED EXCEPT ON THIS FLT. IT WAS NOT IN THE PLANE AFTER THE ANNUAL INSPECTION. FAILURE OF THE CFI (MYSELF) TO VISUALLY CONFIRM WHICH TANK WE HAD SWITCHED TO BECAUSE THE SELECTOR IS LOCATED UNDER HER L THIGH AND CANNOT BE SEEN BY THE PLT IN THE R SEAT WITHOUT UNBUCKLING THE SEAT BELT AND GETTING UP OUT OF THE SEAT. AN INSPECTION OF THE EXHAUSTED TANK'S BLADDER AND SENDING UNIT SHOWED THE BLADDER BUCKLED UP 1 1/4 INCH WHICH HELD THE FLOAT UP AND PERHAPS TRAPPED SOME FUEL BEHIND THE RIDGE, AND A LOOSE/POOR CONNECTION ON THE FUEL SENDER CAUSED THE GAUGE TO SHOW OVER HALF FULL. I HAVE MADE A FUEL DIPSTICK FOR MANY OF THE PLANES THAT I FLY REGULARLY BY DRAINING THE TANK, AND ADDING 2 GALLONS AT A TIME, AND MARKING THE STICK UNTIL THE TANK IS FULL. THIS PLANE DOES NOT HAVE ONE YET. I BELIEVE THIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR ALL TYPES OF ACFT AND I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AMAZED THAT THE MANUFACTURER DOES NOT MAKE ONE. OF THE 65 DIFFERENT MODELS-TYPES OF PLANES I'VE FLOWN IN THE PAST 15 YRS, THE ONLY PLANE I'VE SEEN WITH A DIPSTICK PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER WAS A NEW SMA PLANE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.