37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 223125 |
Time | |
Date | 199210 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : fra |
State Reference | FO |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : pne |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Widebody, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | ground : preflight |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 220 flight time total : 9800 flight time type : 900 |
ASRS Report | 223125 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence other other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Departure from frankfurt, germany, to dulles washington airport. Position entered into IRS navigation appeared to have been incorrect. In the interest of safety we determined that the atlantic crossing could not have been safely performed. The captain had both first officer's elected to land at london's heathrow airport. The flight was non eventful and followed all far's and company's policies and SOP's. I feel this unfortunate situation could have been avoided during preflight. However there was a substantial amount of traffic in the cockpit during cockpit setup. From flight attendant problems to ramp service personnel problems to traffic slot problems. Again I would like to emphasize due to the degree of problems from these individuals we found a problem of our own, a break down of our SOP's. It is my belief that there needs to be a better understanding and touched on more strongly during the training of these individuals, far too often safety is taken for granted from a day to day operation, by other departments.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: INCORRECT PROGRAMMING OF IRS NAV. UNSUITABLE FOR ATLANTIC XING, DIVERT TO ALTERNATE.
Narrative: DEP FROM FRANKFURT, GERMANY, TO DULLES WASHINGTON ARPT. POS ENTERED INTO IRS NAV APPEARED TO HAVE BEEN INCORRECT. IN THE INTEREST OF SAFETY WE DETERMINED THAT THE ATLANTIC XING COULD NOT HAVE BEEN SAFELY PERFORMED. THE CAPT HAD BOTH FO'S ELECTED TO LAND AT LONDON'S HEATHROW ARPT. THE FLT WAS NON EVENTFUL AND FOLLOWED ALL FAR'S AND COMPANY'S POLICIES AND SOP'S. I FEEL THIS UNFORTUNATE SITUATION COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED DURING PREFLT. HOWEVER THERE WAS A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF TFC IN THE COCKPIT DURING COCKPIT SETUP. FROM FLT ATTENDANT PROBLEMS TO RAMP SVC PERSONNEL PROBLEMS TO TFC SLOT PROBLEMS. AGAIN I WOULD LIKE TO EMPHASIZE DUE TO THE DEG OF PROBLEMS FROM THESE INDIVIDUALS WE FOUND A PROBLEM OF OUR OWN, A BREAK DOWN OF OUR SOP'S. IT IS MY BELIEF THAT THERE NEEDS TO BE A BETTER UNDERSTANDING AND TOUCHED ON MORE STRONGLY DURING THE TRAINING OF THESE INDIVIDUALS, FAR TOO OFTEN SAFETY IS TAKEN FOR GRANTED FROM A DAY TO DAY OP, BY OTHER DEPARTMENTS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.