37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 230262 |
Time | |
Date | 199301 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : rsw |
State Reference | FL |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : rsw |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Light Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | landing other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : atp pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 225 flight time total : 3000 flight time type : 600 |
ASRS Report | 230262 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter other non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | other |
Consequence | faa : investigated faa : assigned or threatened penalties |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Flight departed from tpa for rsw on time with 1 passenger on board. Conditions at rsw were clear, windy with gusts up to 34 KTS. Wind shear was evident. Descent and approach checks were completed as per company procedures. While nearing the air traffic area, power was reduced to 500 pounds of torque per engine. The gear horn was silenced and flaps were selected when the airspeed decreased below 188 KTS. At this time the crew discussed and decided to land with 17 degrees of flaps as opposed to 35 degrees due to the gusting winds. 10 KTS were added to the landing reference speed to compensate for the wind and not having 35 des of flaps. The reference speed was 125 KTS. On final our attention was focused on the wind conditions. In the landing flare we discovered the gear was not down and locked when we heard a scraping noise. Captain then took control of the aircraft and initiated a go around, entered right downwind and landed on the same runway (6). We taxied to the gate and unloaded the passenger. The right propeller had the top 5 inches on all 3 blades shaved off and the bottom of the fuselage was scraped toward the rear of the plane. The incident occurred because we were focused on the wind conditions. If we would have selected 35 degree flaps, we would have heard the gear horn. The tower did not report an unsafe gear condition on final. Also, since flaps were not selected full (35 degrees), a final gear check was not done. There is some question in the crews' mind on whether or not the gear and final items were called for. Solutions: a more restrictive gear warning system. Final gear check should be done at some time not affiliated with the selection of flaps full. Tower could ask gear down? As military controllers do with their pilots.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: LTT COMMUTER DEALING WITH WINDSHEAR TOUCHES DOWN WITHOUT GEAR EXTENDED. GAR.
Narrative: FLT DEPARTED FROM TPA FOR RSW ON TIME WITH 1 PAX ON BOARD. CONDITIONS AT RSW WERE CLR, WINDY WITH GUSTS UP TO 34 KTS. WIND SHEAR WAS EVIDENT. DSCNT AND APCH CHKS WERE COMPLETED AS PER COMPANY PROCS. WHILE NEARING THE ATA, PWR WAS REDUCED TO 500 LBS OF TORQUE PER ENG. THE GEAR HORN WAS SILENCED AND FLAPS WERE SELECTED WHEN THE AIRSPD DECREASED BELOW 188 KTS. AT THIS TIME THE CREW DISCUSSED AND DECIDED TO LAND WITH 17 DEGS OF FLAPS AS OPPOSED TO 35 DEGS DUE TO THE GUSTING WINDS. 10 KTS WERE ADDED TO THE LNDG REF SPD TO COMPENSATE FOR THE WIND AND NOT HAVING 35 DES OF FLAPS. THE REF SPD WAS 125 KTS. ON FINAL OUR ATTN WAS FOCUSED ON THE WIND CONDITIONS. IN THE LNDG FLARE WE DISCOVERED THE GEAR WAS NOT DOWN AND LOCKED WHEN WE HEARD A SCRAPING NOISE. CAPT THEN TOOK CTL OF THE ACFT AND INITIATED A GAR, ENTERED R DOWNWIND AND LANDED ON THE SAME RWY (6). WE TAXIED TO THE GATE AND UNLOADED THE PAX. THE R PROP HAD THE TOP 5 INCHES ON ALL 3 BLADES SHAVED OFF AND THE BOTTOM OF THE FUSELAGE WAS SCRAPED TOWARD THE REAR OF THE PLANE. THE INCIDENT OCCURRED BECAUSE WE WERE FOCUSED ON THE WIND CONDITIONS. IF WE WOULD HAVE SELECTED 35 DEG FLAPS, WE WOULD HAVE HEARD THE GEAR HORN. THE TWR DID NOT RPT AN UNSAFE GEAR CONDITION ON FINAL. ALSO, SINCE FLAPS WERE NOT SELECTED FULL (35 DEGS), A FINAL GEAR CHK WAS NOT DONE. THERE IS SOME QUESTION IN THE CREWS' MIND ON WHETHER OR NOT THE GEAR AND FINAL ITEMS WERE CALLED FOR. SOLUTIONS: A MORE RESTRICTIVE GEAR WARNING SYS. FINAL GEAR CHK SHOULD BE DONE AT SOME TIME NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE SELECTION OF FLAPS FULL. TWR COULD ASK GEAR DOWN? AS MIL CTLRS DO WITH THEIR PLTS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.