Narrative:

After 2 missed approachs into st petersburg airport, I chose to proceed to tampa approach. On the ILS 36L approach inside the OM the left engine quit. Was able to get it restarted, but it quit a second time. A short time later the second engine quit. I was unable to restart the right engine. I feel if I used carburetor heat as a preventive at the lower power settings on final like they do in smas, the engines would not have quit so close to the ground. The use of carburetor heat should be taught in dense fog as a preventive measure.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: OFF ARPT EMER FORCED LNDG IN A NIGHT OP.

Narrative: AFTER 2 MISSED APCHS INTO ST PETERSBURG ARPT, I CHOSE TO PROCEED TO TAMPA APCH. ON THE ILS 36L APCH INSIDE THE OM THE L ENG QUIT. WAS ABLE TO GET IT RESTARTED, BUT IT QUIT A SECOND TIME. A SHORT TIME LATER THE SECOND ENG QUIT. I WAS UNABLE TO RESTART THE R ENG. I FEEL IF I USED CARB HEAT AS A PREVENTIVE AT THE LOWER PWR SETTINGS ON FINAL LIKE THEY DO IN SMAS, THE ENGS WOULD NOT HAVE QUIT SO CLOSE TO THE GND. THE USE OF CARB HEAT SHOULD BE TAUGHT IN DENSE FOG AS A PREVENTIVE MEASURE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.