Narrative:

I have had the opportunity to fly the chief one (CHIEF1.mkc) SID from mci seven times this month. On every occasion, we were assigned the angey transition. Having 6 different (all very experienced) first officer's, I had the chance to ask each one what the outbound radial should be. On every occasion, the answer was an erroneous '264.' I must conclude that the graphic depiction of this procedure should be improved. The narrative is indeed correct, but the graphic is misleading. I recommend deleting the arrow from catts intersection to angey intersection or making the dashed line to angey bolder.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: CAPT OF ACR MLG ACFT COMPLAINS ABOUT THE LACK OF CLARITY OF A STANDARD INST DEP (SID) DEPICTION.

Narrative: I HAVE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO FLY THE CHIEF ONE (CHIEF1.MKC) SID FROM MCI SEVEN TIMES THIS MONTH. ON EVERY OCCASION, WE WERE ASSIGNED THE ANGEY TRANSITION. HAVING 6 DIFFERENT (ALL VERY EXPERIENCED) FO'S, I HAD THE CHANCE TO ASK EACH ONE WHAT THE OUTBOUND RADIAL SHOULD BE. ON EVERY OCCASION, THE ANSWER WAS AN ERRONEOUS '264.' I MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE GRAPHIC DEPICTION OF THIS PROC SHOULD BE IMPROVED. THE NARRATIVE IS INDEED CORRECT, BUT THE GRAPHIC IS MISLEADING. I RECOMMEND DELETING THE ARROW FROM CATTS INTXN TO ANGEY INTXN OR MAKING THE DASHED LINE TO ANGEY BOLDER.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.