New first officer objects to the methods used by his captain.

Attributes
ACN	237188
Time
Date	199303
Day	Tue
Local Time Of Day	0601 To 1200
Place
Locale Reference	airport : iad
State Reference	VA
Altitude	agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0
Aircraft 1
Operator	common carrier : air carrier
Make Model Name	Light Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng
Flight Phase	ground other : taxi
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : first officer
Qualification	pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 2750 flight time type : 50
ASRS Report	237188
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : atp
Events
Anomaly	non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation
Independent Detector	other flight crewa
Resolutory Action	none taken : anomaly accepted none taken : unable
Consequence	Other
Supplementary
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

I am a new first officer with a part 135 commuter/regional carrier. I was crewed with a captain for a 3-DAY trip. Numerous times he exercised poor judgement and a lack of cockpit resource management that at times placed the aircraft in danger. For example. 1) disregard for proper checklist usage (i.e., challenge and response). 2) errors in taxiing (i.e., wrong taxiway at dulles international). 3) failure to 'write up' discrepancies in the aircraft as they occurred. As a 'new first officer' I did the best I could to ensure that the flight operated under the carrier's operation specifications. I.e., call checklist and I performing (or ensuring) item was completed. Inform captain that he was on the wrong taxi and informing ground control. Discussed mechanical problems with maintenance at the completion of the flight, etc. In the future I will 'call in sick' if scheduled to fly with this individual again.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: NEW FO OBJECTS TO THE METHODS USED BY HIS CAPT.

Narrative: I AM A NEW FO WITH A PART 135 COMMUTER/REGIONAL CARRIER. I WAS CREWED WITH A CAPT FOR A 3-DAY TRIP. NUMEROUS TIMES HE EXERCISED POOR JUDGEMENT AND A LACK OF COCKPIT RESOURCE MGMNT THAT AT TIMES PLACED THE ACFT IN DANGER. FOR EXAMPLE. 1) DISREGARD FOR PROPER CHKLIST USAGE (I.E., CHALLENGE AND RESPONSE). 2) ERRORS IN TAXIING (I.E., WRONG TXWY AT DULLES INTL). 3) FAILURE TO 'WRITE UP' DISCREPANCIES IN THE ACFT AS THEY OCCURRED. AS A 'NEW FO' I DID THE BEST I COULD TO ENSURE THAT THE FLT OPERATED UNDER THE CARRIER'S OP SPECS. I.E., CALL CHKLIST AND I PERFORMING (OR ENSURING) ITEM WAS COMPLETED. INFORM CAPT THAT HE WAS ON THE WRONG TAXI AND INFORMING GND CTL. DISCUSSED MECHANICAL PROBS WITH MAINT AT THE COMPLETION OF THE FLT, ETC. IN THE FUTURE I WILL 'CALL IN SICK' IF SCHEDULED TO FLY WITH THIS INDIVIDUAL AGAIN.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.