Narrative:

I was soloing my student for his first solo. He made a controled takeoff, a very good pattern and an excellent landing within the first 1/3 of a 6000 ft runway. As he applied power for the takeoff, he failed to maintain directional control and left the runway on the left side. He never got airborne. He realized that he was out of control and pulled the power off. The left side of the runway was freshly plowed and very soft. The aircraft tipped and struck the left wingtip, breaking the plastic fairing and damaging about 8 inches of the leading edge. After moving the aircraft out of the field to firm ground, inspected the damage and taxied the aircraft to the tie-down area and further inspected the aircraft. I called the mechanic and explained the damage. He said it would be okay to fly it back to the home airport (2.6 air mi). I tested its flight characteristics in ground effect and ascertained it was safe to fly to the home airport for repair. I believed, as PIC and having the final authority/authorized to make the decision, that it was airworthy, that I acted properly. After the flight I have learned, since the aircraft was damaged I did not have that authority.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: SOLO STUDENT DAMAGED ACFT. INSTRUCTOR FLIES ACFT TO HOME PORT.

Narrative: I WAS SOLOING MY STUDENT FOR HIS FIRST SOLO. HE MADE A CTLED TKOF, A VERY GOOD PATTERN AND AN EXCELLENT LNDG WITHIN THE FIRST 1/3 OF A 6000 FT RWY. AS HE APPLIED PWR FOR THE TKOF, HE FAILED TO MAINTAIN DIRECTIONAL CTL AND LEFT THE RWY ON THE L SIDE. HE NEVER GOT AIRBORNE. HE REALIZED THAT HE WAS OUT OF CTL AND PULLED THE PWR OFF. THE L SIDE OF THE RWY WAS FRESHLY PLOWED AND VERY SOFT. THE ACFT TIPPED AND STRUCK THE L WINGTIP, BREAKING THE PLASTIC FAIRING AND DAMAGING ABOUT 8 INCHES OF THE LEADING EDGE. AFTER MOVING THE ACFT OUT OF THE FIELD TO FIRM GND, INSPECTED THE DAMAGE AND TAXIED THE ACFT TO THE TIE-DOWN AREA AND FURTHER INSPECTED THE ACFT. I CALLED THE MECH AND EXPLAINED THE DAMAGE. HE SAID IT WOULD BE OKAY TO FLY IT BACK TO THE HOME ARPT (2.6 AIR MI). I TESTED ITS FLT CHARACTERISTICS IN GND EFFECT AND ASCERTAINED IT WAS SAFE TO FLY TO THE HOME ARPT FOR REPAIR. I BELIEVED, AS PIC AND HAVING THE FINAL AUTH TO MAKE THE DECISION, THAT IT WAS AIRWORTHY, THAT I ACTED PROPERLY. AFTER THE FLT I HAVE LEARNED, SINCE THE ACFT WAS DAMAGED I DID NOT HAVE THAT AUTHORITY.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.