37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 252051 |
Time | |
Date | 199309 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sea |
State Reference | WA |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 600 agl bound upper : 600 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Dusk |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : sea artcc : zny |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | cruise other descent : approach landing other |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Light Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Flight Phase | cruise other descent : approach landing other |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : flight engineer |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 15000 flight time type : 1000 |
ASRS Report | 252051 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac non adherence : far non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other other : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 200 vertical : 0 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Cleared ILS runway 34R. Changed to a visual, WX good. We ended up flying side by side with a small commuter aircraft to 34L. Very close call as we each slightly overshot toward each other. The TCASII was going wild. It was an uncomfortable and unsafe approach! We are not trained to do close 'formation' approachs. When will I learn to reject these type approachs which are more and more common today? At the gate, many passenger seated on the left side questioned the safety of the approach. At some point in time the 'capacity versus safety' issues must tilt toward safety!
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: POTENTIAL CONFLICT WITH OTHER ACR ACFT ON VISUAL APCH PROC TO MULTIPLE RWY OP PARALLEL RWYS.
Narrative: CLRED ILS RWY 34R. CHANGED TO A VISUAL, WX GOOD. WE ENDED UP FLYING SIDE BY SIDE WITH A SMALL COMMUTER ACFT TO 34L. VERY CLOSE CALL AS WE EACH SLIGHTLY OVERSHOT TOWARD EACH OTHER. THE TCASII WAS GOING WILD. IT WAS AN UNCOMFORTABLE AND UNSAFE APCH! WE ARE NOT TRAINED TO DO CLOSE 'FORMATION' APCHS. WHEN WILL I LEARN TO REJECT THESE TYPE APCHS WHICH ARE MORE AND MORE COMMON TODAY? AT THE GATE, MANY PAX SEATED ON THE L SIDE QUESTIONED THE SAFETY OF THE APCH. AT SOME POINT IN TIME THE 'CAPACITY VERSUS SAFETY' ISSUES MUST TILT TOWARD SAFETY!
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.