Narrative:

Extended gear to configure for landing. Nosewheel down/lock indicator did not illuminate. Cycled gear - 2ND attempt, still no indication. Broke off the approach. Climbed with radar vectors to hold on localizer runway 4. Leveled off - first officer flying and monitoring, captain trying to communicate with company maintenance. Unable to reach on radio frequency arinc. Exchanged gear indicator bulbs, slowed to gear extension speed, and successfully extended the gear with down/locked indicators on all 3 gears. Also, in transit lights all properly worked during gear extension. We expected the transit light would not work because this was the light we exchanged. Since all worked, he presumed the problem was a dirty contact that we 'fixed' during exchange. Because all appeared normal, we saw no reason to report unnecessary delays. 2 flts later, the problem occurred in btv, vermont. Exchanging the bulbs had no effect and after 2 fly-by's, the tower stated the gear 'appeared down'. We requested emergency equipment standing by and landed without incident. We later performed a maintenance ferry flight to have gear inspected. Evidently the first problem should have been reported but, at the time, appeared to be nothing anyone could do because the problem appeared corrected.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN ACR MADE A MISSED APCH TO ASSURE ITS NOSE LNDG GEAR WAS LOCKED DOWN.

Narrative: EXTENDED GEAR TO CONFIGURE FOR LNDG. NOSEWHEEL DOWN/LOCK INDICATOR DID NOT ILLUMINATE. CYCLED GEAR - 2ND ATTEMPT, STILL NO INDICATION. BROKE OFF THE APCH. CLBED WITH RADAR VECTORS TO HOLD ON LOC RWY 4. LEVELED OFF - FO FLYING AND MONITORING, CAPT TRYING TO COMMUNICATE WITH COMPANY MAINT. UNABLE TO REACH ON RADIO FREQ ARINC. EXCHANGED GEAR INDICATOR BULBS, SLOWED TO GEAR EXTENSION SPD, AND SUCCESSFULLY EXTENDED THE GEAR WITH DOWN/LOCKED INDICATORS ON ALL 3 GEARS. ALSO, IN TRANSIT LIGHTS ALL PROPERLY WORKED DURING GEAR EXTENSION. WE EXPECTED THE TRANSIT LIGHT WOULD NOT WORK BECAUSE THIS WAS THE LIGHT WE EXCHANGED. SINCE ALL WORKED, HE PRESUMED THE PROB WAS A DIRTY CONTACT THAT WE 'FIXED' DURING EXCHANGE. BECAUSE ALL APPEARED NORMAL, WE SAW NO REASON TO RPT UNNECESSARY DELAYS. 2 FLTS LATER, THE PROB OCCURRED IN BTV, VERMONT. EXCHANGING THE BULBS HAD NO EFFECT AND AFTER 2 FLY-BY'S, THE TWR STATED THE GEAR 'APPEARED DOWN'. WE REQUESTED EMER EQUIP STANDING BY AND LANDED WITHOUT INCIDENT. WE LATER PERFORMED A MAINT FERRY FLT TO HAVE GEAR INSPECTED. EVIDENTLY THE FIRST PROB SHOULD HAVE BEEN RPTED BUT, AT THE TIME, APPEARED TO BE NOTHING ANYONE COULD DO BECAUSE THE PROB APPEARED CORRECTED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.