37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 260873 |
Time | |
Date | 199312 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : iad |
State Reference | VA |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : preflight |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 7000 |
ASRS Report | 260873 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other other : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
I flew an aircraft operated by air carrier X airlines. The flight was from iad to swf without incident. 2 days later I learned that the aircraft may not have been legal to fly. Apparently the aircraft was involved in a part swapping incident with another aircraft which is apparently not legal in this case. The aircraft part that was written up was a yaw-damper. It was interchanged with the other aircraft and worked fine, so it was put back on original aircraft and released for service. I had no knowledge of this until 2 days later.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLC OF AN LTT ACR ACFT INADVERTENTLY OPERATED THE ACFT IN AN UNAIRWORTHY STATUS DUE TO A PART REPLACEMENT.
Narrative: I FLEW AN ACFT OPERATED BY ACR X AIRLINES. THE FLT WAS FROM IAD TO SWF WITHOUT INCIDENT. 2 DAYS LATER I LEARNED THAT THE ACFT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN LEGAL TO FLY. APPARENTLY THE ACFT WAS INVOLVED IN A PART SWAPPING INCIDENT WITH ANOTHER ACFT WHICH IS APPARENTLY NOT LEGAL IN THIS CASE. THE ACFT PART THAT WAS WRITTEN UP WAS A YAW-DAMPER. IT WAS INTERCHANGED WITH THE OTHER ACFT AND WORKED FINE, SO IT WAS PUT BACK ON ORIGINAL ACFT AND RELEASED FOR SVC. I HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF THIS UNTIL 2 DAYS LATER.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.