37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 261075 |
Time | |
Date | 199401 |
Day | Sat |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : buf |
State Reference | NY |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | ATR 42 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | ground : preflight |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 240 flight time total : 4200 flight time type : 1300 |
ASRS Report | 261075 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : far other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | faa : investigated Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
On dec/xx/93 and dec/xy/93, I was scheduled for a 2-DAY trip which had scheduled block times of 3:40 and 3:30 for a total of 7:10. The scheduled rest for the overnight was 8:40 (reduced rest). At the completion of our assigned duties on dec/xx and entering into reduced rest period we had flown 5:31 of block time. Noting that no time was going to be dropped within a 24 hour period it became apparent that the rest requirement as we understood it was not sufficient for the block time accumulated and scheduled for the next day's, upon arriving at our overnight accommodations (hotel). We informed scheduling of our conflict. They informed us that the company's interpretation of the regulations pertaining to this specific situation had recently changed resulting from the recent change in FSDO's and our new poi. Management had informed scheduling of this change thereby allowing pilots to fly over 9 hours in a 24 hour period with reduced rest of 8 hours. Scheduling then proceeded to inform us that refusal to fly would result in disciplinary action. Management (chief pilot, etc) was unable to respond to our questions.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FO OF AN MDT ACR ACFT QUESTIONS THE LEGAL DUTY TIME OF FLYING MORE THAN 8 HRS IN A 24 HR PERIOD WITH ONLY OVER 8 HRS OF REST.
Narrative: ON DEC/XX/93 AND DEC/XY/93, I WAS SCHEDULED FOR A 2-DAY TRIP WHICH HAD SCHEDULED BLOCK TIMES OF 3:40 AND 3:30 FOR A TOTAL OF 7:10. THE SCHEDULED REST FOR THE OVERNIGHT WAS 8:40 (REDUCED REST). AT THE COMPLETION OF OUR ASSIGNED DUTIES ON DEC/XX AND ENTERING INTO REDUCED REST PERIOD WE HAD FLOWN 5:31 OF BLOCK TIME. NOTING THAT NO TIME WAS GOING TO BE DROPPED WITHIN A 24 HR PERIOD IT BECAME APPARENT THAT THE REST REQUIREMENT AS WE UNDERSTOOD IT WAS NOT SUFFICIENT FOR THE BLOCK TIME ACCUMULATED AND SCHEDULED FOR THE NEXT DAY'S, UPON ARRIVING AT OUR OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS (HOTEL). WE INFORMED SCHEDULING OF OUR CONFLICT. THEY INFORMED US THAT THE COMPANY'S INTERP OF THE REGS PERTAINING TO THIS SPECIFIC SIT HAD RECENTLY CHANGED RESULTING FROM THE RECENT CHANGE IN FSDO'S AND OUR NEW POI. MGMNT HAD INFORMED SCHEDULING OF THIS CHANGE THEREBY ALLOWING PLTS TO FLY OVER 9 HRS IN A 24 HR PERIOD WITH REDUCED REST OF 8 HRS. SCHEDULING THEN PROCEEDED TO INFORM US THAT REFUSAL TO FLY WOULD RESULT IN DISCIPLINARY ACTION. MGMNT (CHIEF PLT, ETC) WAS UNABLE TO RESPOND TO OUR QUESTIONS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.