Narrative:

After push back requested taxi clearance. Ground control asked if we wanted runway 6R, said 'yes.' not recalling last ATIS which gave 1/8 mi visibility, we accepted. Surface visibility at our location was better than 2 mi. Controller asked if we wanted lights turned down since visibility was much better than reported, we said 'no.' we proceeded with takeoff not thinking it was below stated minimums, even though controller said 'visibility is much better now', (better than 1/8 is 1/4) we would be legal for runway 6R. But ATIS was not changed till PM13 local at which time visibility was 2 mi.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: UNAUTH TKOF WHEN WX MINIMUMS FOR TKOF WERE REPORTED AS TOO LOW FOR OPS.

Narrative: AFTER PUSH BACK REQUESTED TAXI CLRNC. GND CTL ASKED IF WE WANTED RWY 6R, SAID 'YES.' NOT RECALLING LAST ATIS WHICH GAVE 1/8 MI VISIBILITY, WE ACCEPTED. SURFACE VISIBILITY AT OUR LOCATION WAS BETTER THAN 2 MI. CTLR ASKED IF WE WANTED LIGHTS TURNED DOWN SINCE VISIBILITY WAS MUCH BETTER THAN REPORTED, WE SAID 'NO.' WE PROCEEDED WITH TKOF NOT THINKING IT WAS BELOW STATED MINIMUMS, EVEN THOUGH CTLR SAID 'VISIBILITY IS MUCH BETTER NOW', (BETTER THAN 1/8 IS 1/4) WE WOULD BE LEGAL FOR RWY 6R. BUT ATIS WAS NOT CHANGED TILL PM13 LCL AT WHICH TIME VISIBILITY WAS 2 MI.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.